API Management · head to head
Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client

Spring Cloud Gateway
API Management
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
API Management
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Spring Cloud Gateway and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Spring Cloud Gateway | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Java, Spring Boot | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 1998 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Thunder Client
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Both are used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation, microservices, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Spring Cloud Gateway or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Spring Cloud Gateway starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Spring Cloud Gateway or Thunder Client?
- Spring Cloud Gateway starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Spring Cloud Gateway or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Spring Cloud Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Spring Cloud Gateway best used for?
- Spring Cloud Gateway is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation.
- What can Spring Cloud Gateway do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Related pages
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Apigee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Bruno
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Parse Server
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Stoplight
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs 3scale
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Akana
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Asyncapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Backendless
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Apigee
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Thunder Client vs Stoplight
- Thunder Client vs Strapi
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs 3scale
- Thunder Client vs Akana
- Thunder Client vs Asyncapi
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Thunder Client vs Backendless
