Cybersecurity · head to head
Cosign vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Cosign
Cybersecurity
Signs and verifies container images and artifacts, with or without managing keys
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cosign keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Cosign covers Keyless signing, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cosign and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cosign | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker | Java, Spring Boot |
| Category | Cybersecurity | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cosign
- Keyless signing
- Key and KMS signing
- Registry-native storage
- In-toto attestations
- Offline verification
- Trusted root and signing config
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cosign
- Signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keysnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenancenot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifactsnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registrynot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot Cosign
- API Gatewaynot Cosign
- API Testingnot Cosign
- API Documentationnot Cosign
- Microservicesnot Cosign
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cosign
- Keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.
- A signature proves who signed, never whether they should have. The documentation is explicit that Sigstore cannot determine authorisation, so every consumer must write and maintain their own identity and issuer policy or verification means nothing.
- Nothing is enforced without an admission controller. Signing changes what you can prove, not what runs, and the official policy controller has a small maintainer base for a component sitting in a cluster admission path.
- Upgrades break pipelines. Version 3 changed defaults, version 4 is announced as removing legacy functionality and roughly half the command line flags, and two official client libraries still lacked support for the new log format as of mid 2026.
- Signatures do not expire. An artifact signed before a maintainer account was compromised and one signed after are indistinguishable unless somebody is actively monitoring the transparency log, and almost nobody is.
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Cosign
Free- CosignFree
- Apache-2.0
- Public Sigstore infrastructure free to use
- No usage limits published
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cosign if
- You need keyless signing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want key and kms signing.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is Cosign or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cosign starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cosign or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- Cosign starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does Cosign or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- Cosign runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use Cosign for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cosign best used for?
- Cosign is most often used for signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keys, attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenance, meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifacts, verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registry. Of those, signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keys and attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenance are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Cosign do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- Cosign covers Keyless signing, Key and KMS signing, Registry-native storage, In-toto attestations. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cosign: Does Cosign tell me if an image is vulnerable?
No. It has no vulnerability knowledge whatsoever. It can carry an SBOM as a signed attestation but never reads it. Pair it with a scanner.
Spring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
SourceCosign: Is signing alone enough?
No. Verification is a command somebody runs. Without an admission controller enforcing it, an unsigned image still runs.
Spring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
SourceCosign: What does a bare cosign verify actually prove?
Very little. Without a pinned certificate identity and OIDC issuer, it accepts a valid signature from any identity at all.
Cosign: What is the risk of keyless signing?
Your OIDC provider becomes the root of trust. Compromise of that account yields genuine, verifiable signatures, so account security is the control that matters.
Cosign: Should we expect breaking changes?
Yes. Version 4 is announced to remove roughly half the flags, and a post-quantum migration is named as a further breaking change after that.
Related pages
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- Cosign vs Sigstore
- Cosign vs Syft
- Cosign vs Chainguard
- Cosign vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cosign vs Infisical
- Cosign vs OWASP ZAP
- Cosign vs Wireshark
- Cosign vs Bitwarden
- Cosign vs Semgrep
- Cosign vs Trivy
- Cosign vs authentik
- Cosign vs Microsoft Intune
- Cosign vs Netwrix
- Cosign vs NordVPN
- Cosign vs Omada Identity
- Cosign vs Ory
- Cosign vs ProtonVPN
- Cosign vs Grype
- Cosign vs Appwrite
- Cosign vs Hasura
- Cosign vs PocketBase
- Cosign vs Sanity
- Cosign vs Kong Gateway
- Cosign vs Tyk
- Cosign vs Janus Gateway
- Cosign vs Convoy
- Cosign vs WSO2 API Manager
- Cosign vs Gravitee
- Cosign vs KeystoneJS
- Cosign vs Strapi
- Cosign vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Cosign vs Thredd
- Cosign vs Thunder Client
- Cosign vs Toqio
- Cosign vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sigstore
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Syft
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Chainguard
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs HashiCorp Vault
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Infisical
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs OWASP ZAP
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Wireshark
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Bitwarden
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Semgrep
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Trivy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs authentik
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Microsoft Intune
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Netwrix
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs NordVPN
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Omada Identity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Ory
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs ProtonVPN
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Grype
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong
