Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Namespace

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Namespace covers Devboxes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Namespace actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Namespace
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Namespace
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Namespace
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot authentik
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot authentik
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot authentik
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Namespace better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Namespace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Namespace?
- authentik starts at Free and Namespace at Free.
- Does authentik or Namespace run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Namespace is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Namespace cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Namespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Namespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Namespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- authentik vs CodeSandbox
- authentik vs WarpBuild
- authentik vs Depot
- authentik vs Blacksmith
- authentik vs Earthly
- authentik vs Daytona
- authentik vs Ansible
- authentik vs Garden
- authentik vs ConfigCat
- authentik vs Nix
- authentik vs OpsLevel
- authentik vs StackBlitz
- authentik vs Steampipe
- authentik vs Tilt
- authentik vs Webpack
- authentik vs Avo
- Namespace vs Authelia
- Namespace vs Logto
- Namespace vs Ory
- Namespace vs Passbolt
- Namespace vs Clerk
- Namespace vs 1Password
- Namespace vs Frontegg
- Namespace vs OWASP ZAP
- Namespace vs Infisical
- Namespace vs Chainguard
- Namespace vs Bitwarden
- Namespace vs Cosign
- Namespace vs CyberGhost VPN
- Namespace vs Dahua Technology
- Namespace vs Descope
- Namespace vs Drata
- Namespace vs DTiQ
- Namespace vs Ory Kratos
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs ConfigCat
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs StackBlitz
- Namespace vs Steampipe
- Namespace vs Tilt
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
