Cybersecurity · head to head
Logto vs Namespace

Logto
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity and authentication infrastructure for apps and APIs
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Logto advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.; Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- They diverge on capability: Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI, Namespace covers Devboxes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Logto and Namespace actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Logto
- Prebuilt sign-in UI
- Social connectors
- Role-based access control
- Multi-factor authentication
- Machine-to-machine apps
- Audit logs
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Logto
- Adding sign-in to a new SaaS productnot Namespace
- Implementing SSO for B2B customersnot Namespace
- Securing internal APIs with M2M tokensnot Namespace
- Adding RBAC and organizations to a multi-tenant appnot Namespace
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot Logto
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot Logto
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot Logto
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot Logto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Logto
- Advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and requires contacting sales.
- Token-based billing can make cost forecasting harder than flat per-MAU pricing for high-traffic apps.
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
Logto
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 50,000 MAU
- 50K tokens included
- 3 applications
- Pro$24/month
- Unlimited MAU and applications
- 3 included API resources
- Passkey sign-in
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose Logto if
- You need prebuilt sign-in ui.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want social connectors.
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is Logto or Namespace better?
- Neither clearly leads. Logto starts at Free and Namespace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Logto or Namespace?
- Logto starts at Free and Namespace at Free.
- Does Logto or Namespace run on more platforms?
- Logto runs on web, api. Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Logto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Logto best used for?
- Logto is most often used for adding sign-in to a new saas product, implementing sso for b2b customers, securing internal apis with m2m tokens, adding rbac and organizations to a multi-tenant app. Of those, adding sign-in to a new saas product and implementing sso for b2b customers are not what Namespace is typically brought in for.
- What can Logto do that Namespace cannot?
- Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI, Social connectors, Role-based access control, Multi-factor authentication. Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Logto: What does Logto cost?
Logto offers a Free plan at $0/month, a Pro plan starting at $24/month with 50K free tokens included, and a custom-priced Enterprise plan. Extra add-ons like RBAC or MFA are billed separately on Pro.
SourceNamespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceLogto: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 50,000 monthly active users, 3 total applications, 1 machine-to-machine app, 3 social connectors, 1 webhook, and 3-day audit log retention.
SourceNamespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceLogto: How is usage metered?
Logto uses token-based billing: only access tokens issued for authentication and authorization activity are counted, rather than charging purely per MAU.
SourceNamespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Logto vs Ory
- Logto vs authentik
- Logto vs Authelia
- Logto vs Clerk
- Logto vs 1Password
- Logto vs Frontegg
- Logto vs Sigstore
- Logto vs Infisical
- Logto vs OWASP ZAP
- Logto vs Bitwarden
- Logto vs Semgrep
- Logto vs Veriff
- Logto vs Brave Browser
- Logto vs March Networks
- Logto vs Salient CompleteView
- Logto vs Sumsub
- Logto vs Tuta
- Logto vs Ory Kratos
- Logto vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Logto vs CodeSandbox
- Logto vs WarpBuild
- Logto vs Depot
- Logto vs Blacksmith
- Logto vs Earthly
- Logto vs Daytona
- Logto vs Ansible
- Logto vs Garden
- Logto vs ConfigCat
- Logto vs Nix
- Logto vs OpsLevel
- Logto vs StackBlitz
- Logto vs Steampipe
- Logto vs Tilt
- Logto vs Webpack
- Logto vs Avo
- Namespace vs Ory
- Namespace vs authentik
- Namespace vs Authelia
- Namespace vs Clerk
- Namespace vs 1Password
- Namespace vs Frontegg
- Namespace vs Sigstore
- Namespace vs Infisical
- Namespace vs OWASP ZAP
- Namespace vs Bitwarden
- Namespace vs Semgrep
- Namespace vs Veriff
- Namespace vs Brave Browser
- Namespace vs March Networks
- Namespace vs Salient CompleteView
- Namespace vs Sumsub
- Namespace vs Tuta
- Namespace vs Ory Kratos
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs ConfigCat
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs StackBlitz
- Namespace vs Steampipe
- Namespace vs Tilt
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
