Developer Tools · head to head
Backstage vs Depot

Backstage
Developer Tools
Open source internal developer portal framework created and open sourced by Spotify
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Backstage backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.; Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- They diverge on capability: Backstage covers Software catalogue, Depot covers Depot CI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backstage and Depot actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backstage
- Software catalogue
- Software templates
- TechDocs
- Plugin architecture
- Kubernetes plugin
- Search
- Entity ownership model
- Auth provider integrations
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backstage
- An engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morningnot Depot
- A platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, CI and security defaults already wired innot Depot
- A company consolidating scattered READMEs and Confluence pages into docs that live beside the code and cannot silently rot unnoticednot Depot
- A regulated business that needs an auditable register of every running service, its owner and its data classificationnot Depot
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Backstage
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Backstage
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Backstage
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Backstage
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backstage
- Backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.
- Upstream releases move quickly and plugin APIs have broken across major versions, so a customised deployment accumulates upgrade debt and teams routinely fall months behind on versions they cannot cheaply catch up on.
- The catalogue is only as good as the YAML descriptors engineers remember to write; without enforcement the register drifts out of date, and a developer portal nobody trusts is abandoned faster than one that never existed.
- Community plugin quality varies sharply, with many unmaintained or pinned to old core versions, so the plugin that made the business case may be the one blocking your next upgrade.
- Spotify Portal, the packaged commercial route, publishes no price at all and is quoted as a custom annual subscription, so the only cost you can actually forecast up front is the self-hosted one, which is the option with the largest hidden staffing bill.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Backstage
Free- Backstage (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Software catalogue, templates, TechDocs and search
- Full plugin ecosystem
- Spotify Portal for Backstage$undefined/year
- Packaged commercial distribution from Spotify
- Spotify premium plugins including Soundcheck and Insights
- Simplified setup and managed upgrade path
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Which should you pick?
Choose Backstage if
- You need software catalogue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want software templates.
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Questions people ask
- Is Backstage or Depot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backstage starts at Free and Depot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backstage or Depot?
- Backstage starts at Free and Depot at Free.
- Does Backstage or Depot run on more platforms?
- Backstage runs on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- Can I use Backstage for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Backstage best used for?
- Backstage is most often used for an engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morning, a platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, ci and security defaults already wired in, a company consolidating scattered readmes and confluence pages into docs that live beside the code and cannot silently rot unnoticed, a regulated business that needs an auditable register of every running service, its owner and its data classification. Of those, an engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morning and a platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, ci and security defaults already wired in are not what Depot is typically brought in for.
- What can Backstage do that Depot cannot?
- Backstage covers Software catalogue, Software templates, TechDocs, Plugin architecture. Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backstage: Is Backstage free?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The real cost is engineering time; teams commonly dedicate one to two engineers permanently to running it.
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceBackstage: Do I need to write code to use it?
Yes. Configuring and extending a Backstage application is a TypeScript and React project. This is the single most common misjudgement buyers make.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceBackstage: What is Spotify Portal for Backstage?
A commercial distribution from Spotify with premium plugins and support, generally available since October 2025 and sold as a quoted annual subscription with no published price.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceBackstage: Who owns the project?
Spotify created and open sourced it; it is now a CNCF project, so the upstream roadmap is not solely Spotify controlled.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Backstage vs Harness
- Backstage vs Cortex
- Backstage vs OpsLevel
- Backstage vs Tilt
- Backstage vs Ansible
- Backstage vs Frappe
- Backstage vs Refact
- Backstage vs Soketi
- Backstage vs Visual Studio Code
- Backstage vs Penpot
- Backstage vs GNU Emacs
- Backstage vs Bazel
- Backstage vs Argo CD
- Backstage vs Atlantis
- Backstage vs Blacksmith
- Backstage vs Coder
- Backstage vs Garden
- Backstage vs GitLab CI/CD
- Backstage vs WarpBuild
- Backstage vs Nixpacks
- Backstage vs Buildkite
- Backstage vs Namespace
- Backstage vs Earthly
- Backstage vs Nx Cloud
- Backstage vs Dagger
- Backstage vs ConfigCat
- Backstage vs Bitbucket
- Backstage vs Claude Code
- Backstage vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Backstage vs Cody
- Depot vs Harness
- Depot vs Cortex
- Depot vs OpsLevel
- Depot vs Tilt
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs Frappe
- Depot vs Refact
- Depot vs Soketi
- Depot vs Visual Studio Code
- Depot vs Penpot
- Depot vs GNU Emacs
- Depot vs Bazel
- Depot vs Argo CD
- Depot vs Atlantis
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Coder
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Cody
