Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs WarpBuild

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

WarpBuild
Developer Tools
2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Depot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; WarpBuild per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and WarpBuild actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in WarpBuild
- Optimized runner infrastructure
- Intelligent caching
- Incremental builds
- Multi-architecture support
- Unlimited concurrency
- Autoscaling
- BYOC support
- Docker builders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot WarpBuild
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot WarpBuild
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot WarpBuild
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot WarpBuild
WarpBuild
- Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot Depot
- Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot Depot
- Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot Depot
- Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
WarpBuild
- Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
- macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
- BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
WarpBuild
On request- Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
- 2 vCPU
- 8 GB RAM
- Standard performance
- Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
- 4 vCPU
- 16 GB RAM
- Increased performance
- Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
- 8 vCPU
- 32 GB RAM
- High performance
- Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
- 16 vCPU
- 64 GB RAM
- Enterprise performance
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose WarpBuild if
- You need optimized runner infrastructure.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- You also want intelligent caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or WarpBuild better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and WarpBuild at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or WarpBuild?
- Depot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Depot and On request for WarpBuild.
- Does Depot or WarpBuild run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Yes. Depot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. WarpBuild starts at On request.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what WarpBuild is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that WarpBuild cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceWarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?
WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceWarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?
BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceWarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?
Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs Visual Studio Code
- Depot vs ESLint
- Depot vs pnpm
- Depot vs Turborepo
- Depot vs GitHub Copilot
- Depot vs Penpot
- Depot vs Keycloak
- Depot vs Rust
- Depot vs CLion
- Depot vs GNAT Pro
- Depot vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Depot vs GNU Emacs
- Depot vs Keil MDK
- Depot vs Vite
- Depot vs Bazel
- Depot vs CodeSandbox
- Depot vs Eclipse IDE
- Depot vs Moonrepo
- WarpBuild vs Visual Studio Code
- WarpBuild vs ESLint
- WarpBuild vs pnpm
- WarpBuild vs Turborepo
- WarpBuild vs GitHub Copilot
- WarpBuild vs Penpot
- WarpBuild vs Keycloak
- WarpBuild vs Rust
- WarpBuild vs CLion
- WarpBuild vs GNAT Pro
- WarpBuild vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- WarpBuild vs GNU Emacs
- WarpBuild vs Keil MDK
- WarpBuild vs Vite
- WarpBuild vs Bazel
- WarpBuild vs CodeSandbox
- WarpBuild vs Eclipse IDE
- WarpBuild vs Moonrepo
