Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Harness

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Harness
Developer Tools
Software delivery platform across CI, CD, security testing and cost management
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Harness essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Harness actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Harness
Nothing recorded that authentik does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Harness
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Harness
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Harness
Harness
- Deploying apps to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud with rollbacksnot authentik
- Integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before productionnot authentik
- Automating cloud cost reduction and tracking unit-level expensesnot authentik
- Enabling developers to provision infrastructure without operations bottlenecksnot authentik
- Assessing deployment frequency and lead time productivity metricsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Harness
- Essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates
- DevOps Essentials has no on-premises deployment option
- Internal Developer Portal requires minimum 20 developer licenses
- Pipeline execution history retention 6 months (Essentials) vs 25 months as add-on (Enterprise)
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Harness
Free- FreeFree
- Starter platform for software delivery lifecycle
- Open source options available (Harness Open Source, Litmus Chaos)
- Essentials$null/month
- Growing organizations with small to mid-size teams
- Packaged DevOps Essentials bundle
- Continuous software delivery capabilities
- Enterprise$null/month
- Large-scale organizations
- Pick any modules based on needs
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Harness better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Harness at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Harness?
- authentik starts at Free and Harness at Free.
- Does authentik or Harness run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Harness runs on Web.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Harness is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Harness cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Harness: Is there a free Harness plan?
Yes, Harness offers a free plan for individual developers and small teams with open source options including Harness Open Source and Litmus Chaos.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Harness: What are Harness's paid pricing tiers?
Harness offers Essentials for growing teams and Enterprise for large-scale organizations. Both require contacting sales for custom pricing. Pricing is based on modules and features selected.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Harness: Can Harness be deployed on-premises?
Enterprise plans include self-managed platform deployment option. DevOps Essentials bundle does not offer on-premises deployment.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Spacelift
- authentik vs Visual Studio Code
- authentik vs ESLint
- authentik vs pnpm
- authentik vs Turborepo
- authentik vs Atlantis
- authentik vs Backstage
- authentik vs Octopus Deploy
- authentik vs HCP Terraform
- authentik vs Argo CD
- authentik vs Blacksmith
- authentik vs Garden
- authentik vs Namespace
- authentik vs Nix
- authentik vs Nixpacks
- authentik vs Okteto
- authentik vs OpsLevel
- Harness vs Authelia
- Harness vs Logto
- Harness vs Ory
- Harness vs Passbolt
- Harness vs Clerk
- Harness vs 1Password
- Harness vs Frontegg
- Harness vs OWASP ZAP
- Harness vs Infisical
- Harness vs Chainguard
- Harness vs Bitwarden
- Harness vs Cosign
- Harness vs CyberGhost VPN
- Harness vs Dahua Technology
- Harness vs Descope
- Harness vs Drata
- Harness vs DTiQ
- Harness vs Ory Kratos
- Harness vs Spacelift
- Harness vs Visual Studio Code
- Harness vs ESLint
- Harness vs pnpm
- Harness vs Turborepo
- Harness vs Atlantis
- Harness vs Backstage
- Harness vs Octopus Deploy
- Harness vs HCP Terraform
- Harness vs Argo CD
- Harness vs Blacksmith
- Harness vs Garden
- Harness vs Namespace
- Harness vs Nix
- Harness vs Nixpacks
- Harness vs Okteto
- Harness vs OpsLevel
