Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Bruno

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Bruno
APIs
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Bruno covers API Testing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Bruno actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- GitHub
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Bruno
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Bruno
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Bruno
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot authentik
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot authentik
- Offline API development without an accountnot authentik
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core API Client
- Limited Git integration
- 2 Workspaces
- Pro$6/month
- Core API Client
- Native Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
- Ultimate$11/month
- Core API Client
- Full Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Bruno better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Bruno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Bruno?
- authentik starts at Free and Bruno at Free.
- Does authentik or Bruno run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Bruno is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Bruno cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Bruno: What is included in Bruno's free tier?
The Open Source plan includes the core API client, limited Git integration, and up to 2 workspaces at no cost. A 14-day free trial of the Ultimate plan is also available without requiring a credit card.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Bruno: What is the difference between Bruno Pro and Ultimate plans?
Pro ($6/month) includes native Git integration and unlimited workspaces. Ultimate ($11/month) adds SSO/SCIM support, audit logs, 24-hour support (vs. 48-hour), and an account manager. Ultimate supports unlimited OpenAPI syncs while Pro is limited to 5 per month.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Bruno: How much does Bruno Pro save compared to other API tools?
The vendor claims Ultimate saves teams more than 70% versus Postman, though this comparison is promotional rather than a specific cost metric.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs PocketBase
- authentik vs REST Client VSCode
- authentik vs Appwrite
- authentik vs Hasura
- authentik vs Apidog
- authentik vs Sanity
- authentik vs Hoppscotch
- authentik vs HTTPie
- authentik vs Kong
- authentik vs Thunder Client
- authentik vs Tyk
- authentik vs Asyncapi
- authentik vs AWS API Gateway
- authentik vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- authentik vs Basis Theory
- authentik vs Boomi API Management
- authentik vs Codat
- authentik vs Kong Gateway
- Bruno vs Authelia
- Bruno vs Logto
- Bruno vs Ory
- Bruno vs Passbolt
- Bruno vs Clerk
- Bruno vs 1Password
- Bruno vs Frontegg
- Bruno vs OWASP ZAP
- Bruno vs Infisical
- Bruno vs Chainguard
- Bruno vs Bitwarden
- Bruno vs Cosign
- Bruno vs CyberGhost VPN
- Bruno vs Dahua Technology
- Bruno vs Descope
- Bruno vs Drata
- Bruno vs DTiQ
- Bruno vs Ory Kratos
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs REST Client VSCode
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs Apidog
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Hoppscotch
- Bruno vs HTTPie
- Bruno vs Kong
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs Tyk
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Basis Theory
- Bruno vs Boomi API Management
- Bruno vs Codat
- Bruno vs Kong Gateway
