Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Bruno

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Bruno
APIs
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Bruno covers API Testing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Bruno actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- GitHub
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Bruno
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Bruno
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Bruno
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Authelia
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Authelia
- Offline API development without an accountnot Authelia
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core API Client
- Limited Git integration
- 2 Workspaces
- Pro$6/month
- Core API Client
- Native Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
- Ultimate$11/month
- Core API Client
- Full Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Bruno better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Bruno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Bruno?
- Authelia starts at Free and Bruno at Free.
- Does Authelia or Bruno run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Bruno is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Bruno cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Bruno: What is included in Bruno's free tier?
The Open Source plan includes the core API client, limited Git integration, and up to 2 workspaces at no cost. A 14-day free trial of the Ultimate plan is also available without requiring a credit card.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Bruno: What is the difference between Bruno Pro and Ultimate plans?
Pro ($6/month) includes native Git integration and unlimited workspaces. Ultimate ($11/month) adds SSO/SCIM support, audit logs, 24-hour support (vs. 48-hour), and an account manager. Ultimate supports unlimited OpenAPI syncs while Pro is limited to 5 per month.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Bruno: How much does Bruno Pro save compared to other API tools?
The vendor claims Ultimate saves teams more than 70% versus Postman, though this comparison is promotional rather than a specific cost metric.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs PocketBase
- Authelia vs REST Client VSCode
- Authelia vs Appwrite
- Authelia vs Hasura
- Authelia vs Apidog
- Authelia vs Sanity
- Authelia vs Hoppscotch
- Authelia vs HTTPie
- Authelia vs Kong
- Authelia vs Thunder Client
- Authelia vs Tyk
- Authelia vs Asyncapi
- Authelia vs AWS API Gateway
- Authelia vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Authelia vs Basis Theory
- Authelia vs Boomi API Management
- Authelia vs Codat
- Authelia vs Kong Gateway
- Bruno vs authentik
- Bruno vs Logto
- Bruno vs Ory Kratos
- Bruno vs Frontegg
- Bruno vs Infisical
- Bruno vs Bitwarden
- Bruno vs Semgrep
- Bruno vs Trivy
- Bruno vs Chainguard
- Bruno vs Passbolt
- Bruno vs 1Password
- Bruno vs Signicat
- Bruno vs Silent Eight
- Bruno vs Socket
- Bruno vs Socure
- Bruno vs SonicWall
- Bruno vs Sophos Intercept X
- Bruno vs Ory
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs REST Client VSCode
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs Apidog
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Hoppscotch
- Bruno vs HTTPie
- Bruno vs Kong
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs Tyk
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Basis Theory
- Bruno vs Boomi API Management
- Bruno vs Codat
- Bruno vs Kong Gateway
