Maps · head to head
Apple Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps

Apple Maps
Maps
Web mapping and navigation application developed by Apple Inc
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apple Maps live traffic updates, public transit info, and satellite view all require an active internet connection, offline mode (iOS 17+) is limited to pre-downloaded areas for driving, walking, cycling, and transit directions; ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- They diverge on capability: Apple Maps covers Core Functionality, ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apple Maps and ArcGIS Field Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apple Maps | ArcGIS Field Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence |
| Platforms | iOS, macOS, Web | iOS, Android, Web |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apple Maps
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apple Maps
- Turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigationnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Public transit directions with real-time schedules (subways, buses, trains, ferries)not ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline turn-by-turn directions for pre-downloaded areas (iOS 17+)not ArcGIS Field Maps
- Augmented-reality immersive walking directions in supported citiesnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Saving custom hiking/walking routes, including U.S. national park hikes, for offline accessnot ArcGIS Field Maps
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Apple Maps
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Apple Maps
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Apple Maps
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Apple Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apple Maps
- Live traffic updates, public transit info, and satellite view all require an active internet connection, offline mode (iOS 17+) is limited to pre-downloaded areas for driving, walking, cycling, and transit directions
- Apple Maps for the web is only in public beta, not a full-featured release
- Feature depth (e.g. immersive walking AR directions, detailed transit) is strongest on newer iPhones/iOS versions, leaving older devices with a reduced experience
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Pricing, plan by plan
Apple Maps
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Apple Maps review.
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Which should you pick?
Choose Apple Maps if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on iOS, macOS, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Questions people ask
- Is Apple Maps or ArcGIS Field Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apple Maps starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apple Maps or ArcGIS Field Maps?
- Apple Maps starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request.
- Does Apple Maps or ArcGIS Field Maps run on more platforms?
- Apple Maps runs on iOS, macOS, Web. ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- What is Apple Maps best used for?
- Apple Maps is most often used for turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation, public transit directions with real-time schedules (subways, buses, trains, ferries), offline turn-by-turn directions for pre-downloaded areas (ios 17+), augmented-reality immersive walking directions in supported cities. Of those, turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation and public transit directions with real-time schedules (subways, buses, trains, ferries) are not what ArcGIS Field Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Apple Maps do that ArcGIS Field Maps cannot?
- Apple Maps covers Core Functionality, User Interface. ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apple Maps: Is there a cost to integrate Apple Maps into my app?
The Apple Maps pricing page does not disclose whether MapKit or MapKit JS integration is free or paid. You would need to consult Apple's developer documentation for current pricing and licensing terms.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Apple Maps: What are the usage limits for Apple Maps integration?
The pricing page does not specify any rate limits, monthly minimums, or usage caps for MapKit or MapKit JS. This information is available in Apple's developer documentation.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Apple Maps: Are there different pricing tiers for MapKit and MapKit JS?
The Apple Maps page mentions MapKit for iOS, iPadOS, and macOS apps, and MapKit JS for websites, but does not provide pricing details or tier information for either option.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- Apple Maps vs MAPS.ME
- Apple Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Apple Maps vs OsmAnd
- Apple Maps vs HERE Technologies
- Apple Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- Apple Maps vs deck.gl
- Apple Maps vs Bing Maps
- Apple Maps vs Citymapper
- Apple Maps vs GraphHopper
- Apple Maps vs MapQuest
- Apple Maps vs Mapzen
- Apple Maps vs TomTom
- Apple Maps vs Atlas.co
- Apple Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- Apple Maps vs Correlator3D
- Apple Maps vs Emlid Studio
- Apple Maps vs Felt
- Apple Maps vs QGIS
- Apple Maps vs SW Maps
- Apple Maps vs CARTO
- Apple Maps vs Global Mapper
- Apple Maps vs GRASS GIS
- Apple Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Apple Maps vs Trailforks
- Apple Maps vs onX Maps
- Apple Maps vs Mapbox
- Apple Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- Apple Maps vs Leaflet
- Apple Maps vs Cesium ion
- Apple Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs MAPS.ME
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Navmii GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OsmAnd
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs deck.gl
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs MapQuest
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapzen
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs TomTom
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Atlas.co
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Correlator3D
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Emlid Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
