Databases · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs PlanetScale

Amazon Redshift
Databases
Fast, scalable cloud data warehouse from AWS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; PlanetScale pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, PlanetScale covers Database Branching.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and PlanetScale actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot PlanetScale
- Data warehousingnot PlanetScale
- Real-time analyticsnot PlanetScale
- Reportingnot PlanetScale
- Machine learningnot PlanetScale
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Amazon Redshift
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Amazon Redshift
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/month
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/month
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or PlanetScale better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or PlanetScale?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or PlanetScale run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what PlanetScale is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that PlanetScale cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourcePlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs BigQuery
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs MotherDuck
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs TiDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs TimescaleDB
- Amazon Redshift vs QuestDB
- Amazon Redshift vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Amazon Redshift vs Timeplus
- Amazon Redshift vs turbopuffer
- Amazon Redshift vs VerneMQ
- Amazon Redshift vs Vespa
- Amazon Redshift vs Xata
- Amazon Redshift vs Google Cloud SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Pinot
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Nile
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs FaunaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DataGrip
- Amazon Redshift vs Readyset
- Amazon Redshift vs IBM Db2
- Amazon Redshift vs Instaclustr
- Amazon Redshift vs Knack
- Amazon Redshift vs LanceDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Marqo
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs Firebolt
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs Azure SQL
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Apache Druid
- PlanetScale vs TimescaleDB
- PlanetScale vs QuestDB
- PlanetScale vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- PlanetScale vs Timeplus
- PlanetScale vs turbopuffer
- PlanetScale vs VerneMQ
- PlanetScale vs Vespa
- PlanetScale vs Xata
- PlanetScale vs Google Cloud SQL
- PlanetScale vs CosmosDB
- PlanetScale vs Apache Pinot
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs IBM Db2
- PlanetScale vs Instaclustr
- PlanetScale vs Knack
- PlanetScale vs LanceDB
- PlanetScale vs Marqo
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB

