Databases · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Google Cloud SQL

Amazon Redshift
Databases
Fast, scalable cloud data warehouse from AWS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Google Cloud SQL
Databases
Fully managed relational database service for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Google Cloud SQL locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Google Cloud SQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Google Cloud SQL |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Google Cloud Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2008 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Google Cloud SQL
- High Availability
- Automated Backups
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Regional/Zonal Instances
- Read Replicas
- Private IP
- BigQuery
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Google Cloud SQL
- Data warehousingnot Google Cloud SQL
- Real-time analyticsnot Google Cloud SQL
- Reporting
- Machine learningnot Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
- Transaction processingnot Amazon Redshift
- Data storagenot Amazon Redshift
- Application backendnot Amazon Redshift
- Reporting
- Data analyticsnot Amazon Redshift
Both are used for reporting, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Google Cloud SQL
- Locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability
- Pay-as-you-go pricing can become expensive with unpredictable workloads
- Limited customization options compared to self-managed databases
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Google Cloud SQL
Free- Free TierFree
- db-f1-micro instance
- 30GB storage
- Limited usage
- Standard$25/month
- High availability
- Automated backups
- Point-in-time recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Google Cloud SQL if
- You need high availability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want automated backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Google Cloud SQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Google Cloud SQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Google Cloud SQL?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Google Cloud SQL at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Google Cloud SQL run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. Google Cloud SQL runs on Google Cloud Platform.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Google Cloud SQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Google Cloud SQL cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability, Automated Backups, Point-in-time Recovery, Encryption. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: What database engines does Google Cloud SQL support?
Google Cloud SQL supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server. Users can choose their preferred engine when provisioning an instance and Google handles automated backups, replication, patching, and scaling.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Does Google Cloud SQL have a free tier?
Google Cloud SQL does not have a free tier, though new users receive free trial credits from Google Cloud Platform. Pricing is based on compute resources (CPU and memory) and storage used, with options for committed use discounts.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Can Google Cloud SQL scale automatically?
Yes. Cloud SQL automatically scales database storage and compute resources to handle increased workloads without manual intervention, and includes automated backups and high availability configurations.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
More on Google Cloud SQL
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs BigQuery
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs MotherDuck
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs TiDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs TimescaleDB
- Amazon Redshift vs QuestDB
- Amazon Redshift vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Amazon Redshift vs Timeplus
- Amazon Redshift vs turbopuffer
- Amazon Redshift vs VerneMQ
- Amazon Redshift vs Vespa
- Amazon Redshift vs Xata
- Amazon Redshift vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Pinot
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs Aiven
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs MariaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DataStax
- Amazon Redshift vs FaunaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs ArangoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Canary Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs Chroma
- Amazon Redshift vs Cloudinary
- Amazon Redshift vs Convex
- Amazon Redshift vs Dgraph
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Google Cloud SQL vs BigQuery
- Google Cloud SQL vs Firebolt
- Google Cloud SQL vs ClickHouse
- Google Cloud SQL vs MotherDuck
- Google Cloud SQL vs Azure SQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs TiDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Druid
- Google Cloud SQL vs TimescaleDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs QuestDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Google Cloud SQL vs Timeplus
- Google Cloud SQL vs turbopuffer
- Google Cloud SQL vs VerneMQ
- Google Cloud SQL vs Vespa
- Google Cloud SQL vs Xata
- Google Cloud SQL vs CosmosDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Pinot
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cockroach Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Aiven
- Google Cloud SQL vs PostgreSQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs MariaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs DataStax
- Google Cloud SQL vs FaunaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs ArangoDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Canary Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Chroma
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cloudinary
- Google Cloud SQL vs Convex
- Google Cloud SQL vs Dgraph
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Aurora
- Google Cloud SQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
