Databases · head to head
PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL
Databases
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PlanetScale pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions; PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- They diverge on capability: PlanetScale covers Database Branching, PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and PostgreSQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix |
| Founded | 2018 | 1996 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
Both cover
- Prisma
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot PostgreSQL
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot PostgreSQL
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot PostgreSQL
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot PlanetScale
- Data storagenot PlanetScale
- Application backendnot PlanetScale
- Reportingnot PlanetScale
- Data analyticsnot PlanetScale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/month
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/month
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or PostgreSQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or PostgreSQL?
- PlanetScale starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free.
- Does PlanetScale or PostgreSQL run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure). PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- Can I use PlanetScale for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling, postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations, multi-region database deployments on aws or gcp, applications requiring transparent sharding via vitess. Of those, mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling and postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations are not what PostgreSQL is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that PostgreSQL cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility. Both handle Prisma.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourcePostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourcePostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourcePostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourcePostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourcePostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs IBM Db2
- PlanetScale vs Instaclustr
- PlanetScale vs Knack
- PlanetScale vs LanceDB
- PlanetScale vs Marqo
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs MariaDB
- PlanetScale vs Oracle Database
- PlanetScale vs Microsoft SQL Server
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs Aiven
- PlanetScale vs SQLite
- PlanetScale vs Couchbase
- PlanetScale vs QuestDB
- PlanetScale vs Firestore
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Redshift
- PlanetScale vs Apache Pinot
- PlanetScale vs Apache Pulsar
- PlanetScale vs Cassandra
- PlanetScale vs CouchDB
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Aurora
- PostgreSQL vs Nile
- PostgreSQL vs Airtable
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs BigQuery
- PostgreSQL vs MotherDuck
- PostgreSQL vs FaunaDB
- PostgreSQL vs DataGrip
- PostgreSQL vs TiDB
- PostgreSQL vs Readyset
- PostgreSQL vs IBM Db2
- PostgreSQL vs Instaclustr
- PostgreSQL vs Knack
- PostgreSQL vs LanceDB
- PostgreSQL vs Marqo
- PostgreSQL vs DynamoDB
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs Aiven
- PostgreSQL vs SQLite
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs QuestDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firestore
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pinot
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pulsar
- PostgreSQL vs Cassandra
- PostgreSQL vs CouchDB

