Databases · head to head
Microsoft SQL Server vs PlanetScale

Microsoft SQL Server
Databases
Enterprise-grade relational database management system
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft SQL Server licensing and on-premises deployment costs are high compared to open-source alternatives, with Enterprise Edition exceeding $60,000 for minimum core requirements; PlanetScale pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft SQL Server covers T-SQL, PlanetScale covers Database Branching.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft SQL Server and PlanetScale actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft SQL Server | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Platforms | Windows Server, Linux (RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu), Docker, Azure | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Founded | 1989 | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft SQL Server
- T-SQL
- ACID Compliance
- Advanced Security
- In-memory OLTP
- Columnstore Indexes
- Always On Availability
- Machine Learning Services
- Azure
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft SQL Server
- Transaction processingnot PlanetScale
- Data storagenot PlanetScale
- Application backendnot PlanetScale
- Reportingnot PlanetScale
- Data analyticsnot PlanetScale
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Microsoft SQL Server
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Microsoft SQL Server
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Microsoft SQL Server
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Microsoft SQL Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft SQL Server
- Licensing and on-premises deployment costs are high compared to open-source alternatives, with Enterprise Edition exceeding $60,000 for minimum core requirements
- Performance monitoring toolset is insufficient for hybrid cloud environments requiring real-time analytics across multiple deployment types
- Heavy I/O resource consumption can saturate disk volumes and degrade performance when processing large transaction workloads
- Always On availability groups with up to 8 secondary replicas are limited to Enterprise edition only; Standard supports only basic availability groups with 2 replicas
- CPU and memory scaling is capped at 4 sockets or 32 cores on Standard edition, limiting deployments requiring higher compute capacity
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft SQL Server
Free- ExpressFree
- 4 cores maximum
- 1.4 GB memory per instance
- 50 GB database size limit
- DeveloperFree
- All Enterprise features
- Non-production use only
- Standard$3945/per 2-core pack
- 32 core maximum per instance
- 256 GB buffer pool memory
- Basic availability groups with 2 replicas
- Enterprise$15123/per 2-core pack
- Unlimited scaling
- Always On with up to 8 secondaries
- Advanced security and HA features
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/month
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/month
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft SQL Server if
- You need t-sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows Server, Linux (RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu), Docker, Azure.
- You also want acid compliance.
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft SQL Server or PlanetScale better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft SQL Server starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft SQL Server or PlanetScale?
- Microsoft SQL Server starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free.
- Does Microsoft SQL Server or PlanetScale run on more platforms?
- Microsoft SQL Server runs on Windows Server, Linux (RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu), Docker, Azure. PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use Microsoft SQL Server for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Microsoft SQL Server best used for?
- Microsoft SQL Server is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what PlanetScale is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft SQL Server do that PlanetScale cannot?
- Microsoft SQL Server covers T-SQL, ACID Compliance, Advanced Security, In-memory OLTP. PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft SQL Server: What is the pricing model for SQL Server?
SQL Server uses core-based licensing with per-2-core pack pricing. Enterprise Edition costs approximately $15,123 per 2-core pack (minimum 8 cores). Standard Edition costs approximately $3,945 per 2-core pack. Developer and Express editions are free. Software Assurance adds 25-35% annually for upgrades and support.
SourcePlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: Does SQL Server run on Linux?
Yes. SQL Server 2017 and later run on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Ubuntu), Docker containers, and Windows with feature parity including Always On availability groups, Active Directory authentication, and encryption.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: Is there a free edition of SQL Server?
Yes. SQL Server Express is free and includes all functionality of Enterprise edition for development and testing, with limits of 4 cores, 1,410 MB memory per instance, and 50 GB per database. Developer edition is also free for non-production use.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: Can SQL Server be deployed offline?
Yes. SQL Server can be installed from offline media on machines without internet access. Microsoft provides complete offline installation packages for SQL Server, SSMS, and supporting components, making deployment in isolated or air-gapped environments feasible.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: What high availability options does SQL Server provide?
SQL Server offers Always On availability groups (Enterprise only), Always On failover cluster instances, database mirroring, log shipping, and for disaster recovery, failover servers in Azure and Accelerated Database Recovery for faster recovery after failures.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft SQL Server
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- Microsoft SQL Server vs IBM Db2
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Oracle Database
- Microsoft SQL Server vs PostgreSQL
- Microsoft SQL Server vs MariaDB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs ClickHouse
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Google Cloud SQL
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Apache Flink
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Couchbase
- Microsoft SQL Server vs DuckDB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs DataGrip
- Microsoft SQL Server vs SingleStore
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Canary Labs
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Chroma
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Cloudinary
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Convex
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Dgraph
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Dragonfly
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Apache Solr
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Nile
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Airtable
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Cockroach Labs
- Microsoft SQL Server vs BigQuery
- Microsoft SQL Server vs MotherDuck
- Microsoft SQL Server vs FaunaDB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs TiDB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Readyset
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Instaclustr
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Knack
- Microsoft SQL Server vs LanceDB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Marqo
- Microsoft SQL Server vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs IBM Db2
- PlanetScale vs Oracle Database
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs MariaDB
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs Google Cloud SQL
- PlanetScale vs Apache Flink
- PlanetScale vs Couchbase
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs SingleStore
- PlanetScale vs Canary Labs
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Cloudinary
- PlanetScale vs Convex
- PlanetScale vs Dgraph
- PlanetScale vs Dragonfly
- PlanetScale vs Apache Solr
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs Instaclustr
- PlanetScale vs Knack
- PlanetScale vs LanceDB
- PlanetScale vs Marqo
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB

