Databases · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Neo4j

Amazon Redshift
Databases
Fast, scalable cloud data warehouse from AWS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Neo4j actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Neo4j |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web |
| Founded | 2012 | 2007 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Neo4j
- Data warehousingnot Neo4j
- Real-time analyticsnot Neo4j
- Reportingnot Neo4j
- Machine learningnot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Amazon Redshift
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Amazon Redshift
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Neo4j?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Neo4j cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceNeo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs BigQuery
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs MotherDuck
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs TiDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs TimescaleDB
- Amazon Redshift vs QuestDB
- Amazon Redshift vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Amazon Redshift vs Timeplus
- Amazon Redshift vs turbopuffer
- Amazon Redshift vs VerneMQ
- Amazon Redshift vs Vespa
- Amazon Redshift vs Xata
- Amazon Redshift vs Google Cloud SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Pinot
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs ArangoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Dgraph
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Couchbase
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs Valkey
- Amazon Redshift vs Canary Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs Chroma
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs CouchDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Doris
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs Firebolt
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs MotherDuck
- Neo4j vs Azure SQL
- Neo4j vs TiDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- Neo4j vs TimescaleDB
- Neo4j vs QuestDB
- Neo4j vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Neo4j vs Timeplus
- Neo4j vs turbopuffer
- Neo4j vs VerneMQ
- Neo4j vs Vespa
- Neo4j vs Xata
- Neo4j vs Google Cloud SQL
- Neo4j vs CosmosDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Pinot
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr

