Databases · head to head
PlanetScale vs SingleStore

SingleStore
Databases
The real-time distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PlanetScale pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions; SingleStore high licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- They diverge on capability: PlanetScale covers Database Branching, SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and SingleStore actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Only in SingleStore
- Real-time Analytics
- Fast Data Ingest
- In-memory Processing
- Distributed Architecture
- MySQL Compatible
- Columnar Storage
- Vector Search
- Kafka
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot SingleStore
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot SingleStore
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot SingleStore
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot SingleStore
SingleStore
- Transaction processingnot PlanetScale
- Data storagenot PlanetScale
- Application backendnot PlanetScale
- Reportingnot PlanetScale
- Data analyticsnot PlanetScale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
SingleStore
- High licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- Eventual consistency in replication: secondary replicas may lag during high write loads
- Complex operational setup requiring specialized knowledge for optimization
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology without open-source alternatives
- Disorganized documentation and lack of online training resources
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/month
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/month
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
SingleStore
Free- Free Tier$0.99/month
- Usage-based pricing
- Limited resources
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Choose SingleStore if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- You also want fast data ingest.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or SingleStore better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at Free and SingleStore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or SingleStore?
- PlanetScale starts at Free and SingleStore at Free.
- Does PlanetScale or SingleStore run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure). SingleStore runs on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- Can I use PlanetScale for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling, postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations, multi-region database deployments on aws or gcp, applications requiring transparent sharding via vitess. Of those, mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling and postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations are not what SingleStore is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that SingleStore cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics, Fast Data Ingest, In-memory Processing, Distributed Architecture. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceSingleStore: Does SingleStore offer a free tier?
Yes, SingleStore offers a free tier starting from $0.99/month with usage-based pricing. The free tier allows developers to evaluate the platform with limited resources before scaling to production workloads.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore handle both transactional and analytical workloads?
Yes, SingleStore is a hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) database that combines operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads in a single unified engine, eliminating the need for separate systems.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourceSingleStore: Does SingleStore integrate with Apache Spark?
Yes, SingleStore provides the Spark Connector 3.0 for bidirectional data integration with Apache Spark. The connector supports SQL, Python, Scala, Java, and R for data loading and extraction.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore ingest data from Kafka?
Yes, SingleStore supports high-throughput streaming ingestion from Apache Kafka and other sources, enabling millions of events per second without requiring ETL pipelines or data movement.
SourceSingleStore: Is SingleStore available as cloud or self-managed?
SingleStore offers both deployment options: SingleStoreDB Cloud (managed service) and SingleStore Self-Managed for on-premises or private cloud deployments. The managed service handles infrastructure, scaling, and maintenance automatically.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
More on SingleStore
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs IBM Db2
- PlanetScale vs Instaclustr
- PlanetScale vs Knack
- PlanetScale vs LanceDB
- PlanetScale vs Marqo
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs Apache Druid
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs Elasticsearch
- PlanetScale vs Materialize
- PlanetScale vs TimescaleDB
- PlanetScale vs Estuary
- PlanetScale vs Fivetran HVR
- PlanetScale vs Firebolt
- PlanetScale vs Ninox
- PlanetScale vs Presto
- PlanetScale vs Privacera
- PlanetScale vs RavenDB
- PlanetScale vs Apache Pinot
- PlanetScale vs Apache Flink
- SingleStore vs Amazon Aurora
- SingleStore vs Nile
- SingleStore vs Airtable
- SingleStore vs Cockroach Labs
- SingleStore vs PostgreSQL
- SingleStore vs BigQuery
- SingleStore vs MotherDuck
- SingleStore vs FaunaDB
- SingleStore vs DataGrip
- SingleStore vs TiDB
- SingleStore vs Readyset
- SingleStore vs IBM Db2
- SingleStore vs Instaclustr
- SingleStore vs Knack
- SingleStore vs LanceDB
- SingleStore vs Marqo
- SingleStore vs DynamoDB
- SingleStore vs Apache Druid
- SingleStore vs ClickHouse
- SingleStore vs DuckDB
- SingleStore vs Elasticsearch
- SingleStore vs Materialize
- SingleStore vs TimescaleDB
- SingleStore vs Estuary
- SingleStore vs Fivetran HVR
- SingleStore vs Firebolt
- SingleStore vs Ninox
- SingleStore vs Presto
- SingleStore vs Privacera
- SingleStore vs RavenDB
- SingleStore vs Apache Pinot
- SingleStore vs Apache Flink

