Databases · head to head
PlanetScale vs Supabase
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PlanetScale pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions; Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- They diverge on capability: PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Supabase covers PostgreSQL database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and Supabase actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Databases | Technology |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Supabase
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Supabase
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Supabase
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Supabase
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot PlanetScale
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot PlanetScale
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot PlanetScale
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot PlanetScale
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot PlanetScale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/month
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/month
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or Supabase better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at Free and Supabase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or Supabase?
- PlanetScale starts at Free and Supabase at Free.
- Does PlanetScale or Supabase run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure). Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use PlanetScale for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling, postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations, multi-region database deployments on aws or gcp, applications requiring transparent sharding via vitess. Of those, mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling and postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations are not what Supabase is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that Supabase cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceSupabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceSupabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Elasticsearch
- PlanetScale vs Apache Kafka
- PlanetScale vs Meilisearch
- PlanetScale vs Turso
- PlanetScale vs Azure SQL
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs Couchbase
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs MariaDB
- PlanetScale vs Oracle Database
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs Firebolt
- PlanetScale vs Google Cloud SQL
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs Asana
- PlanetScale vs ClickUp
- PlanetScale vs Linear
- PlanetScale vs Figma
- PlanetScale vs Kubernetes
- PlanetScale vs Notion
- PlanetScale vs Datadog
- PlanetScale vs Monday.com
- PlanetScale vs Terraform
- PlanetScale vs Docker
- PlanetScale vs Greenhouse
- PlanetScale vs Google Chrome
- PlanetScale vs Intercom
- PlanetScale vs Mozilla Firefox
- PlanetScale vs Okta
- PlanetScale vs PostHog
- PlanetScale vs Redis
- PlanetScale vs Amplitude
- Supabase vs Cockroach Labs
- Supabase vs PostgreSQL
- Supabase vs Airtable
- Supabase vs Amazon Aurora
- Supabase vs Elasticsearch
- Supabase vs Apache Kafka
- Supabase vs Meilisearch
- Supabase vs Turso
- Supabase vs Azure SQL
- Supabase vs ClickHouse
- Supabase vs Couchbase
- Supabase vs DuckDB
- Supabase vs MariaDB
- Supabase vs Oracle Database
- Supabase vs DataGrip
- Supabase vs Firebolt
- Supabase vs Google Cloud SQL
- Supabase vs MotherDuck
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Kubernetes
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs Datadog
- Supabase vs Monday.com
- Supabase vs Terraform
- Supabase vs Docker
- Supabase vs Greenhouse
- Supabase vs Google Chrome
- Supabase vs Intercom
- Supabase vs Mozilla Firefox
- Supabase vs Okta
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Amplitude


