Databases · head to head
PlanetScale vs QuestDB

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PlanetScale pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: PlanetScale covers Database Branching, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and QuestDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | QuestDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot QuestDB
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot QuestDB
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot QuestDB
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot PlanetScale
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot PlanetScale
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not PlanetScale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/month
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/month
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or QuestDB?
- PlanetScale starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does PlanetScale or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure). QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use PlanetScale for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling, postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations, multi-region database deployments on aws or gcp, applications requiring transparent sharding via vitess. Of those, mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling and postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that QuestDB cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceQuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs IBM Db2
- PlanetScale vs Instaclustr
- PlanetScale vs Knack
- PlanetScale vs LanceDB
- PlanetScale vs Marqo
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs TimescaleDB
- PlanetScale vs Firebolt
- PlanetScale vs Apache Flink
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs OpenSearch
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs NATS
- PlanetScale vs Canary Labs
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Cloudinary
- PlanetScale vs Convex
- PlanetScale vs Dgraph
- PlanetScale vs Dragonfly
- PlanetScale vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Nile
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs BigQuery
- QuestDB vs MotherDuck
- QuestDB vs FaunaDB
- QuestDB vs DataGrip
- QuestDB vs TiDB
- QuestDB vs Readyset
- QuestDB vs IBM Db2
- QuestDB vs Instaclustr
- QuestDB vs Knack
- QuestDB vs LanceDB
- QuestDB vs Marqo
- QuestDB vs DynamoDB
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid

