Databases · head to head
ClickHouse vs PlanetScale

ClickHouse
Databases
Fast open-source column-oriented database for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClickHouse limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems; PlanetScale pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- They diverge on capability: ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, PlanetScale covers Database Branching.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClickHouse and PlanetScale actually diverge.
| Attribute | ClickHouse | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker) | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClickHouse
- Column-oriented Storage
- Real-time Analytics
- SQL Support
- Linear Scalability
- Data Compression
- Vectorized Query Execution
- Approximate Calculations
- Kafka
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClickHouse
- Business intelligencenot PlanetScale
- Data warehousingnot PlanetScale
- Real-time analyticsnot PlanetScale
- Reportingnot PlanetScale
- Machine learningnot PlanetScale
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot ClickHouse
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot ClickHouse
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot ClickHouse
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot ClickHouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClickHouse
- Limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems
- Requires upfront schema design discipline with MergeTree engine choices and sort/partition keys
- Experimental vector search support, not production-ready for vector operations
- Different query syntax from standard SQL requiring migration planning
- Limited JOIN capabilities compared to traditional relational databases
- Migration complexity with 2-4 weeks estimated for data type mapping and query translation
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Pricing, plan by plan
ClickHouse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ClickHouse review.
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/month
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/month
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/month
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Which should you pick?
Choose ClickHouse if
- You need column-oriented storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker).
- You also want real-time analytics.
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is ClickHouse or PlanetScale better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClickHouse starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClickHouse or PlanetScale?
- ClickHouse starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free.
- Does ClickHouse or PlanetScale run on more platforms?
- ClickHouse runs on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker). PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use ClickHouse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClickHouse best used for?
- ClickHouse is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what PlanetScale is typically brought in for.
- What can ClickHouse do that PlanetScale cannot?
- ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, Real-time Analytics, SQL Support, Linear Scalability. PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClickHouse: What is ClickHouse best used for?
ClickHouse is optimized for analytical workloads on large datasets. It excels at fast aggregations and queries, being 10-100x faster than PostgreSQL on large aggregations.
SourcePlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceClickHouse: Does ClickHouse support transactions?
ClickHouse has limited transaction support and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations. It is not suitable for transactional workloads requiring strict ACID guarantees.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceClickHouse: How does ClickHouse compare to PostgreSQL?
ClickHouse is 10-100x faster for analytics but PostgreSQL is better for transactional workloads. Many teams use both: PostgreSQL for writes via MaterializedPostgreSQL replication to ClickHouse for analytics.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- ClickHouse vs Apache Druid
- ClickHouse vs SingleStore
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Redshift
- ClickHouse vs TimescaleDB
- ClickHouse vs Tinybird
- ClickHouse vs Timeplus
- ClickHouse vs StarRocks
- ClickHouse vs Presto
- ClickHouse vs DuckDB
- ClickHouse vs Valkey
- ClickHouse vs ArangoDB
- ClickHouse vs Canary Labs
- ClickHouse vs Chroma
- ClickHouse vs Apache Pinot
- ClickHouse vs Apache Doris
- ClickHouse vs Cassandra
- ClickHouse vs Apache Solr
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Aurora
- ClickHouse vs Nile
- ClickHouse vs Airtable
- ClickHouse vs Cockroach Labs
- ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL
- ClickHouse vs BigQuery
- ClickHouse vs MotherDuck
- ClickHouse vs FaunaDB
- ClickHouse vs DataGrip
- ClickHouse vs TiDB
- ClickHouse vs Readyset
- ClickHouse vs IBM Db2
- ClickHouse vs Instaclustr
- ClickHouse vs Knack
- ClickHouse vs LanceDB
- ClickHouse vs Marqo
- ClickHouse vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs Apache Druid
- PlanetScale vs SingleStore
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Redshift
- PlanetScale vs TimescaleDB
- PlanetScale vs Tinybird
- PlanetScale vs Timeplus
- PlanetScale vs StarRocks
- PlanetScale vs Presto
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs Valkey
- PlanetScale vs ArangoDB
- PlanetScale vs Canary Labs
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Apache Pinot
- PlanetScale vs Apache Doris
- PlanetScale vs Cassandra
- PlanetScale vs Apache Solr
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs IBM Db2
- PlanetScale vs Instaclustr
- PlanetScale vs Knack
- PlanetScale vs LanceDB
- PlanetScale vs Marqo
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB

