Database & Data Management · head to head
BigQuery vs PlanetScale

BigQuery
Database & Data Management
Serverless, highly scalable enterprise data warehouse
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PlanetScale
Database & Data Management
The MySQL-compatible serverless database
- From
- $15/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only BigQuery has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: BigQuery query costs can become substantial for organizations with high query volumes; PlanetScale eBS High Availability requires 3-node configuration with replication overhead
- They diverge on capability: BigQuery covers Serverless Architecture, PlanetScale covers Database Branching.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigQuery and PlanetScale actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigQuery | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $15/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud API | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Database & Data Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigQuery
- Serverless Architecture
- Petabyte Scale
- Real-time Analytics
- Machine Learning
- Geospatial Analysis
- Streaming Ingestion
- Standard SQL
- Looker
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigQuery
- Business intelligencenot PlanetScale
- Data warehousingnot PlanetScale
- Real-time analyticsnot PlanetScale
- Reportingnot PlanetScale
- Machine learningnot PlanetScale
PlanetScale
- MySQL database hosting with automatic failover and replicationnot BigQuery
- Vitess-based sharding for horizontal scaling across large datasetsnot BigQuery
- Cloud provider flexibility across AWS, GCP, Azure with 60+ regionsnot BigQuery
- Cost-effective database clusters using ARM64 architecture optionsnot BigQuery
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigQuery
- Query costs can become substantial for organizations with high query volumes
- Data egress from Google Cloud incurs additional charges
PlanetScale
- EBS High Availability requires 3-node configuration with replication overhead
- EBS Non-HA single-node option lacks redundancy and automatic failover
- Pricing varies by cloud provider and region, requiring queries for specific rates
- ARM64 architecture only available on EBS tier, not Metal deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
BigQuery
Free- Free TierFree
- 1TB queries/month
- 10GB storage/month
- Standard support
- On-demand$6.25/TB
- Pay per query
- Pay per storage
- All features
PlanetScale
$15/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the PlanetScale review.
Which should you pick?
Choose BigQuery if
- You need serverless architecture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud API.
- You also want petabyte scale.
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is BigQuery or PlanetScale better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigQuery starts at Free and PlanetScale at $15/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigQuery or PlanetScale?
- BigQuery has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for BigQuery and $15/month for PlanetScale.
- Does BigQuery or PlanetScale run on more platforms?
- BigQuery runs on Web, Cloud API. PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use BigQuery for free?
- Yes. BigQuery has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PlanetScale starts at $15/month.
- What is BigQuery best used for?
- BigQuery is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what PlanetScale is typically brought in for.
- What can BigQuery do that PlanetScale cannot?
- BigQuery covers Serverless Architecture, Petabyte Scale, Real-time Analytics, Machine Learning. PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigQuery: How is BigQuery priced?
BigQuery charges $5 per terabyte of data processed in on-demand queries. Storage is billed separately: active storage is charged per GB, and data inactive for 90+ days moves to long-term storage at reduced rates.
SourceBigQuery: What is BigQuery's architecture?
BigQuery separates compute and storage, using Google's Colossus for distributed storage and Borg for computation, allowing independent scaling of each.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- BigQuery vs Cockroach Labs
- BigQuery vs PostgreSQL
- BigQuery vs Airtable
- BigQuery vs Amazon Aurora
- BigQuery vs Elasticsearch
- BigQuery vs Azure SQL
- BigQuery vs ClickHouse
- BigQuery vs Couchbase
- BigQuery vs DuckDB
- BigQuery vs DynamoDB
- BigQuery vs MariaDB
- BigQuery vs Oracle Database
- BigQuery vs Amazon RDS
- BigQuery vs Amazon Redshift
- BigQuery vs Apache Druid
- BigQuery vs Cassandra
- BigQuery vs CouchDB
- BigQuery vs Firebolt
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Elasticsearch
- PlanetScale vs Azure SQL
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs Couchbase
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs MariaDB
- PlanetScale vs Oracle Database
- PlanetScale vs Amazon RDS
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Redshift
- PlanetScale vs Apache Druid
- PlanetScale vs Cassandra
- PlanetScale vs CouchDB
- PlanetScale vs Firebolt
