Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs GPS Trackit

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Free plan
- No

GPS Trackit
Fleet Management
Vehicle tracking for small and mid-size fleets with no long-term contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; GPS Trackit month-to-month pricing carries a premium, so measured across three years the total cost usually exceeds a competitor with hardware amortised into a term contract.
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, GPS Trackit covers Live tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and GPS Trackit actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | GPS Trackit |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Per vehicle per month |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in GPS Trackit
- Live tracking
- Driver behaviour
- VidFleet cameras
- Maintenance reminders
- Self-installed devices
- Alerts and reports
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot GPS Trackit
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot GPS Trackit
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot GPS Trackit
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot GPS Trackit
GPS Trackit
- A contractor whose fleet size swings with the season and who cannot justify a three-year commitment on vehicles it may not run next springnot Agisoft Metashape
- A small service business trialling telematics for the first time that wants an exit if drivers or supervisors do not adopt itnot Agisoft Metashape
- A fleet that needs devices fitted the week they arrive, without booking installation appointments across a depotnot Agisoft Metashape
- An operator replacing a vendor mid-contract that wants a stopgap platform rather than another long agreementnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
GPS Trackit
- Month-to-month pricing carries a premium, so measured across three years the total cost usually exceeds a competitor with hardware amortised into a term contract.
- The feature set is tracking-first, with a shallow maintenance module and no meaningful work order, parts or inventory management, so fleets serious about maintenance need a second system.
- Compliance tooling is basic, and a fleet that takes on regulated interstate work will find the hours of service capability behind vendors built around the mandate.
- The integration list is short and the API is limited, so pushing telematics data into payroll, job costing or an ERP normally becomes a manual export routine.
- Self-installed OBD-II devices are easy to fit and equally easy for a driver to unplug, and the tamper reporting does not make up for the fact that the physical device is within reach of the person being monitored.
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
GPS Trackit
On request- GPS Trackit$undefined/month
- Month-to-month subscription per vehicle with no minimum term
- Tracking hardware supplied with the subscription
- Camera hardware and video plans charged separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose GPS Trackit if
- You need live tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want driver behaviour.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or GPS Trackit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and GPS Trackit at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or GPS Trackit?
- Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and GPS Trackit at On request.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or GPS Trackit run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. GPS Trackit runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what GPS Trackit is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that GPS Trackit cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. GPS Trackit covers Live tracking, Driver behaviour, VidFleet cameras, Maintenance reminders.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
GPS Trackit: Is there really no contract?
The subscription is month to month, but read the hardware terms. Devices are supplied on the expectation they come back, and unreturned units are charged for.
Agisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
GPS Trackit: How does the cost compare to Samsara or Verizon Connect over three years?
Generally higher per vehicle, because those vendors discount in exchange for the commitment. The comparison only favours GPS Trackit if you value the ability to leave.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
GPS Trackit: Can drivers unplug the tracker?
A plug-in OBD-II device can be removed in seconds. The system reports the disconnection, but enforcement is a management problem, not a technical one. Hardwired units are available for fleets where this matters.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on GPS Trackit
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Verizon Connect
- Agisoft Metashape vs Samsara
- Agisoft Metashape vs Azuga
- Agisoft Metashape vs Motive
- Agisoft Metashape vs NexTraq
- Agisoft Metashape vs Quartix
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lytx
- Agisoft Metashape vs Omnitracs
- Agisoft Metashape vs CalAmp
- Agisoft Metashape vs Whip Around
- Agisoft Metashape vs Chevin FleetWave
- Agisoft Metashape vs Uptake
- Agisoft Metashape vs Ridecell
- Agisoft Metashape vs Webfleet
- GPS Trackit vs QGIS
- GPS Trackit vs Correlator3D
- GPS Trackit vs Global Mapper
- GPS Trackit vs Cesium ion
- GPS Trackit vs Potree
- GPS Trackit vs Leica Infinity
- GPS Trackit vs Emlid Studio
- GPS Trackit vs onX Maps
- GPS Trackit vs SW Maps
- GPS Trackit vs Fused
- GPS Trackit vs Lonboard
- GPS Trackit vs Trailforks
- GPS Trackit vs Atlas.co
- GPS Trackit vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- GPS Trackit vs Felt
- GPS Trackit vs Geographic Calculator
- GPS Trackit vs Verizon Connect
- GPS Trackit vs Samsara
- GPS Trackit vs Azuga
- GPS Trackit vs Motive
- GPS Trackit vs NexTraq
- GPS Trackit vs Quartix
- GPS Trackit vs Lytx
- GPS Trackit vs Omnitracs
- GPS Trackit vs CalAmp
- GPS Trackit vs Whip Around
- GPS Trackit vs Chevin FleetWave
- GPS Trackit vs Uptake
- GPS Trackit vs Ridecell
- GPS Trackit vs Webfleet
