Trulioovs
Veriff


Veriff: Cheaper and more transparent when the requirement is document plus selfie rather than registry matching

Identity and business verification against national data sources in nearly 200 countries
As of 1 September 2026, Trulioo's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Verifies people and companies by matching supplied details against authoritative registries rather than by scanning a document. Softwr lists it under Cybersecurity. Trulioo is available on Web, API.
Overview
Trulioo runs identity verification through a single API that routes to hundreds of underlying data sources: credit bureaux, telco records, electoral rolls, government registries and commercial databases. It also verifies businesses, resolving legal entities, registration status and ultimate beneficial ownership across roughly a hundred and fifty jurisdictions. Document and biometric verification are available, but the data-source route is the historical core. The distinction matters commercially. Document scanning requires a user with a passport or driving licence and a decent phone camera. Data-source verification requires only a name, address and date of birth, which is faster, cheaper per check and works for populations where document capture has poor completion rates. In practice most regulated buyers use both: data first because it is cheap and frictionless, document only when data fails. Buyers are payment firms, banks, crypto platforms and marketplaces onboarding across many countries. The trade-off is coverage variance. Trulioo aggregates other people data, so quality is a function of what sources exist in each market, and a country listed as covered may have thin or slow sources behind it. The right diligence is to test your actual top five countries, not to read the coverage map.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Trulioo.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Veriff: Cheaper and more transparent when the requirement is document plus selfie rather than registry matching


Fenergo: If the real problem is institutional client onboarding workflow and regulatory classification rather than one-off checks
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Trulioo Platform
On request
Capabilities
Person match
Verification against credit, telco, government and utility data sources rather than documents
Business verification
Entity resolution, registration status and beneficial ownership across roughly 150 jurisdictions
Watchlist screening
Sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening within the same workflow
Document and biometric
Document capture and liveness available as a fallback when data-source matching fails
Single API
One integration routing to hundreds of underlying sources with normalised responses
Workflow orchestration
Configurable cascades that try cheap checks first and escalate only on failure
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Not for the core product. Data-source matching uses name, address and date of birth, which is why completion rates are higher than document flows.
Yes, in general you pay per query rather than per successful match. Negotiate this explicitly if you are entering markets with thin coverage.
Yes. Business verification including beneficial ownership is a distinct product line and a common reason to choose Trulioo over document-first vendors.
Keep looking
Document and biometric identity verification with published per-check pricing
Client lifecycle management and KYC onboarding for regulated financial institutions
Identity verification and AML screening bundled into a single per-verification price
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
Predictive identity verification and fraud scoring for the US market
Document-based identity verification for regulated onboarding
Identity verification and qualified electronic signature for regulated European markets
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
Reusable digital identity, facial age estimation and identity verification
Entity resolution and network analytics for financial crime investigation
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
AI video search that runs on cameras you already own, starting near five dollars per camera per month
Stop breaches with AI-native cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening bundled into a single per-verification price
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Trulioo, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Large Chinese video platform that US federal buyers and federal contractors cannot lawfully use
quoteManaged video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
quoteWorkforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
Per user per monthPrivileged access management, endpoint privilege management and secure remote access
quoteCloud video surveillance billed per camera per month, where retention length drives the bill more than anything else
Per camera per monthAI video search that runs on cameras you already own, starting near five dollars per camera per month
Per camera per monthPhishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
quote