Research · head to head
LabArchives vs NVivo

LabArchives
Research
Electronic lab notebook with witnessing, version history and long-term institutional retention
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NVivo
Research
Easy-to-use, collaborative qualitative analysis software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only LabArchives has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: LabArchives the corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.; NVivo base plan pricing not displayed on shop page; requires adding to cart or contacting sales
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LabArchives and NVivo actually diverge.
| Attribute | LabArchives | NVivo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LabArchives
- Versioned entries
- Witnessing and signing
- Inventory
- Scheduler
- Education edition
- Single sign-on
- Structured data entry
- DOI and repository publishing
Only in NVivo
Nothing recorded that LabArchives does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LabArchives
- A university group that must keep research records after a PhD student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptopnot NVivo
- A core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and whennot NVivo
- A small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entriesnot NVivo
- A teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook worknot NVivo
NVivo
- Qualitative data analysis for researchnot LabArchives
- Document and interview coding and analysisnot LabArchives
- Transcription and collaborative research projectsnot LabArchives
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LabArchives
- The corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.
- Inventory and Scheduler are separate per-user line items, so a lab that assumed one price per person for a working system ends up paying two or three.
- It is now a Dotmatics product inside a large scientific software portfolio, which puts roadmap priority with enterprise pharmaceutical buyers rather than with the academic labs that made it popular.
- The interface is functional rather than pleasant, and adoption typically fails not on features but on researchers quietly continuing to keep notes elsewhere; you need a mandate, not a rollout email.
- Instrument integration is thin compared with dedicated laboratory information management systems, so automated capture from analytical equipment usually still means manual upload or custom scripting.
NVivo
- Base plan pricing not displayed on shop page; requires adding to cart or contacting sales
- Volume licensing (10+ seats) requires sales contact only
- No free version available, only trials without specified duration
Pricing, plan by plan
LabArchives
Free- FreeFree
- Limited storage
- Core notebook and versioning
- Intended for evaluation and individual use
- Professional (Academic)$330/year
- Full ELN with witnessing and signing
- Academic rate per user per year
- Corporate rate is $575 per user per year
- ELN plus Inventory bundle$360/year
- Notebook plus sample and reagent inventory
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $675 per user per year
- Inventory standalone$99/year
- Sample tracking without the notebook
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $199 per user per year
NVivo
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the NVivo review.
Which should you pick?
Choose LabArchives if
- You need versioned entries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want witnessing and signing.
Choose NVivo if
Nothing in the data separates NVivo from LabArchives on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is LabArchives or NVivo better?
- Neither clearly leads. LabArchives starts at Free and NVivo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LabArchives or NVivo?
- LabArchives has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for LabArchives and On request for NVivo.
- Does LabArchives or NVivo run on more platforms?
- LabArchives runs on Web, iOS, Android. NVivo runs on Web.
- Can I use LabArchives for free?
- Yes. LabArchives has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NVivo starts at On request.
- What is LabArchives best used for?
- LabArchives is most often used for a university group that must keep research records after a phd student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptop, a core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and when, a small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entries, a teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook work. Of those, a university group that must keep research records after a phd student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptop and a core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and when are not what NVivo is typically brought in for.
- What can LabArchives do that NVivo cannot?
- LabArchives covers Versioned entries, Witnessing and signing, Inventory, Scheduler.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LabArchives: Does LabArchives satisfy patent evidence requirements?
Its versioning, timestamping and witnessed signatures are designed for that purpose, and it is widely accepted for it, but the legal weight depends on your institution's process being followed, not on the software alone.
NVivo: How much does NVivo cost?
NVivo pricing is not displayed on the public website. Base plan pricing varies by subscription type and region. Individual/small teams can purchase directly through shop.lumivero.com, while organizations with 10+ licenses must contact sales for quotes.
SourceLabArchives: Who owns LabArchives?
Dotmatics. The product is branded LabArchives by Dotmatics and shares that company's corporate footprint.
NVivo: What are NVivo add-on costs?
NVivo AI Assistant costs $250 per year. Transcription costs $499 per year (50 hours annually) or $30 one-time (60 minutes). Collaboration Cloud for team sharing costs $99 per year.
SourceLabArchives: Is there really a free tier?
Yes, with limited storage. It is suitable for trialling or a single researcher, not for a group that needs retention guarantees.
NVivo: Does NVivo offer a free version?
No free version of NVivo is available. Free trials are available at the product website, though trial duration is not specified. Individual users can purchase licenses directly through lumivero.com.
SourceLabArchives: Can we export everything if we leave?
Yes, notebooks export in bulk, but exported archives lose much of the interactive structure, so treat the export as an archive rather than as a migration path into another ELN.
NVivo: Is NVivo AI Assistant included in subscription?
No, NVivo AI Assistant is a paid add-on costing $250 per year. However, through August 18-September 15, 2026, AI Assistant is free with annual NVivo + AI subscriptions using code BTSAI100.
SourceRelated pages
More on LabArchives
Other head to heads
- LabArchives vs Florence eBinders
- LabArchives vs Dotmatics
- LabArchives vs Labguru
- LabArchives vs Benchling
- LabArchives vs Sapio Sciences
- LabArchives vs LabVantage
- LabArchives vs Scispot
- LabArchives vs Wolfram Mathematica
- LabArchives vs Castor EDC
- LabArchives vs TetraScience
- LabArchives vs Valispace
- LabArchives vs Elicit
- LabArchives vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- LabArchives vs Zappi
- LabArchives vs Zotero
- LabArchives vs Marvin
- LabArchives vs Obsidian
- LabArchives vs Roam Research
- LabArchives vs Mendeley
- LabArchives vs Dovetail
- LabArchives vs Aurelius
- LabArchives vs Condens
- LabArchives vs Genedata
- LabArchives vs Remesh
- LabArchives vs Seven Bridges
- LabArchives vs Terra
- LabArchives vs SurveySparrow
- LabArchives vs Contentsquare
- LabArchives vs GWI
- NVivo vs Florence eBinders
- NVivo vs Dotmatics
- NVivo vs Labguru
- NVivo vs Benchling
- NVivo vs Sapio Sciences
- NVivo vs LabVantage
- NVivo vs Scispot
- NVivo vs Wolfram Mathematica
- NVivo vs Castor EDC
- NVivo vs TetraScience
- NVivo vs Valispace
- NVivo vs Elicit
- NVivo vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- NVivo vs Zappi
- NVivo vs Zotero
- NVivo vs Marvin
- NVivo vs Obsidian
- NVivo vs Roam Research
- NVivo vs Mendeley
- NVivo vs Dovetail
- NVivo vs Aurelius
- NVivo vs Condens
- NVivo vs Genedata
- NVivo vs Remesh
- NVivo vs Seven Bridges
- NVivo vs Terra
- NVivo vs SurveySparrow
- NVivo vs Contentsquare
- NVivo vs GWI
