Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs Snyk

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Snyk has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; Snyk free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- They diverge on capability: Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Snyk covers Open source security.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and Snyk actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in Snyk
- Open source security
- Code security (SAST)
- Container security
- IaC security
- License compliance
- Fix PRs
- Priority scoring
- Developer IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Snyk
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Snyk
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Snyk
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Snyk
Snyk
- Vulnerability scanningnot Diligent
- Application securitynot Diligent
- Infrastructure as Code securitynot Diligent
- Container securitynot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Snyk
- Free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- Free and Team plans count only contributing developers making commits within 90 days; public contributions do not count
- Enterprise plan requires custom pricing and sales contact
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Snyk
Free- FreeFree
- SCA scanning
- SAST scanning
- IaC and Container scanning
- Team$25/month
- 1000 Code tests
- 100 projects
- Jira integration
- Ignite$105/month
- Unlimited tests
- Unlimited projects
- Custom security rules
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Zero-day prevention
- Unified AppSec control
- Full SDLC automation
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Choose Snyk if
- You need open source security.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- You also want code security (sast).
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or Snyk better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and Snyk at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or Snyk?
- Snyk has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Diligent and Free for Snyk.
- Does Diligent or Snyk run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Snyk runs on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- Can I use Snyk for free?
- Yes. Snyk has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Diligent starts at On request.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what Snyk is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that Snyk cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management. Snyk covers Open source security, Code security (SAST), Container security, IaC security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Snyk: How much does Snyk cost?
Snyk offers a free plan with limited tests, Team plan at $25/month per contributing developer, Ignite at $1260/year, and custom Enterprise pricing. Contributing developers are those who made commits to private repos within the last 90 days.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Snyk: What does Snyk's Team plan include?
The Team plan at $25/month includes 1000 Code tests, up to 100 projects, Jira integration, next business day support, and all features from the free plan including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning.
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Snyk: Is there a free version of Snyk?
Yes, Snyk offers a free plan with full platform access including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning. The free tier includes 200 Open Source tests, 100 Code tests, 300 IaC tests, 100 Container tests, and up to 5 projects.
SourceDiligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs Aikido
- Diligent vs Grype
- Diligent vs Arnica
- Diligent vs Chainguard
- Diligent vs Falco
- Diligent vs Socket
- Diligent vs Endor Labs
- Diligent vs Legit Security
- Diligent vs 1Password
- Diligent vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Diligent vs Norton 360
- Diligent vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Diligent vs Infisical
- Diligent vs JumpCloud
- Diligent vs McAfee Total Protection
- Diligent vs NICE Actimize
- Diligent vs Semgrep
- Snyk vs LogicManager
- Snyk vs Resolver
- Snyk vs MetricStream
- Snyk vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Snyk vs Transcend
- Snyk vs OneTrust
- Snyk vs Milestone XProtect
- Snyk vs Camio
- Snyk vs Delinea
- Snyk vs Dahua Technology
- Snyk vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Snyk vs IBM QRadar
- Snyk vs Trivy
- Snyk vs Trulioo
- Snyk vs Unit21
- Snyk vs Veracode
- Snyk vs Very Good Security
- Snyk vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Snyk vs Aikido
- Snyk vs Grype
- Snyk vs Arnica
- Snyk vs Chainguard
- Snyk vs Falco
- Snyk vs Socket
- Snyk vs Endor Labs
- Snyk vs Legit Security
- Snyk vs 1Password
- Snyk vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Snyk vs Norton 360
- Snyk vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Snyk vs Infisical
- Snyk vs JumpCloud
- Snyk vs McAfee Total Protection
- Snyk vs NICE Actimize
- Snyk vs Semgrep

