Manufacturing · head to head
Prodsmart vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP

Prodsmart
Manufacturing
Mobile manufacturing execution for small plants, acquired by Autodesk and folded into Fusion Operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Manufacturing
Distributed control system for continuous process plants with a documented 30-year upgrade path
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Prodsmart the product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.; Yokogawa CENTUM VP there is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Prodsmart and Yokogawa CENTUM VP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Prodsmart | Yokogawa CENTUM VP |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Prodsmart
- Mobile shop floor declarations
- No controller integration required
- Traceability
- Live production status
- Basic OEE
- Maintenance records
Only in Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Field Control Station
- N-IO
- Human Interface Station
- ProSafe-RS integration
- Vnet/IP
- Migration from CS 1000 and CS 3000
- Exaquantum integration
- Alarm management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Prodsmart
- A small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofitnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on papernot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floornot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- An Autodesk Fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its CAD and CAMnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Replacing end-of-life CENTUM CS 3000 controllers during a refinery turnaround without pulling field cablingnot Prodsmart
- Greenfield LNG train where the control and safety systems must share one operator console and one event lognot Prodsmart
- Specialty chemicals batch plant needing sequence control with recipe management and full electronic batch recordsnot Prodsmart
- Combined cycle power station where 99.99999 percent availability figures are written into the contractnot Prodsmart
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Prodsmart
- The product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- All data originates from operator declarations, so accuracy depends entirely on shop floor discipline, and a plant that cannot enforce scanning gets confident charts built on incomplete input.
- Because it reads nothing from machines, it cannot detect a stoppage the operator does not report, which means downtime analysis captures what people admit to rather than what happened.
- Scheduling and planning are shallow compared with a full MES or ERP, so most customers still plan elsewhere and use Prodsmart for execution only.
- Support and account management now run through a very large software vendor, and small manufacturers frequently report longer response paths than they had with the original company.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- There is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- Engineering and commissioning routinely cost several times the hardware and software, and owners who budget from the equipment quote alone are consistently short.
- The ecosystem is closed: controllers, I/O and diagnostics are Yokogawa, and third-party alternatives at the controller layer do not exist, so the vendor holds pricing power for the twenty years or more the plant runs.
- Operator stations run on Windows and are tied to specific validated Windows releases, so operating system end-of-life forces console refresh cycles that are governed by Yokogawa validation rather than by your IT policy.
- Engineering staff who know CENTUM are scarce outside Japan, the Middle East and South East Asia, and in North America and Europe you will pay a premium or depend on Yokogawa’s own services organisation for changes.
Pricing, plan by plan
Prodsmart
On request- Prodsmart (Autodesk Fusion Operations)$undefined/year
- Mobile shop floor execution
- Traceability and production reporting
- Sold within the Autodesk Fusion product family
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
On request- CENTUM VP$undefined/year
- Priced as an engineered system, not a per-seat licence
- Cost driven by I/O count, controller redundancy and number of operator stations
- Engineering, FAT, commissioning and training quoted separately and usually exceed hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose Prodsmart if
- You need mobile shop floor declarations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no controller integration required.
Choose Yokogawa CENTUM VP if
- You need field control station.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want n-io.
Questions people ask
- Is Prodsmart or Yokogawa CENTUM VP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Prodsmart starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Prodsmart or Yokogawa CENTUM VP?
- Prodsmart starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request.
- Does Prodsmart or Yokogawa CENTUM VP run on more platforms?
- Prodsmart runs on Web, iOS, Android. Yokogawa CENTUM VP runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is Prodsmart best used for?
- Prodsmart is most often used for a small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofit, a plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on paper, a shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floor, an autodesk fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its cad and cam. Of those, a small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofit and a plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on paper are not what Yokogawa CENTUM VP is typically brought in for.
- What can Prodsmart do that Yokogawa CENTUM VP cannot?
- Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, No controller integration required, Traceability, Live production status. Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station, N-IO, Human Interface Station, ProSafe-RS integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Prodsmart: Who owns Prodsmart?
Autodesk acquired it in 2022 and has integrated it into the Fusion product family as its operations offering.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Can I upgrade from CENTUM CS 3000 without rewiring the plant?
Yes. Yokogawa sells migration packages that replace the controller and keep existing field wiring and marshalling, which is the main reason CENTUM installations stay CENTUM.
Prodsmart: Does it need my machines to be connected?
No. That is the central design decision. Operators declare production on mobile devices.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Is CENTUM VP sold as a subscription?
No. It is a capital purchase of hardware and licences with an annual service agreement for updates and support.
Prodsmart: Is it a full MES?
It covers execution, traceability and basic OEE. Detailed scheduling, quality workflows and controller level data are not its scope.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: How does it compare with Emerson DeltaV on cost?
Neither publishes prices. CENTUM tends to win on brownfield migration cost because the field wiring stays; DeltaV tends to be cheaper on small greenfield systems.
Prodsmart: Can I still buy it as a standalone product?
It is sold through Autodesk. Confirm the current packaging and pricing with Autodesk rather than relying on pre acquisition material.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Do I need a separate safety system?
Yes, for SIL-rated functions. ProSafe-RS is the Yokogawa SIS and shares the CENTUM engineering database and operator console.
Related pages
More on Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Other head to heads
- Prodsmart vs Tulip
- Prodsmart vs MachineMetrics
- Prodsmart vs TrakSYS
- Prodsmart vs Authentise
- Prodsmart vs Oqton
- Prodsmart vs Flow Software
- Prodsmart vs QAD Redzone
- Prodsmart vs 3YOURMIND
- Prodsmart vs Sight Machine
- Prodsmart vs Guidewheel
- Prodsmart vs ProShop ERP
- Prodsmart vs Ignition
- Prodsmart vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Prodsmart vs LabVIEW
- Prodsmart vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Prodsmart vs ABB 800xA
- Prodsmart vs AVEVA System Platform
- Prodsmart vs Hippo CMMS
- Prodsmart vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Prodsmart vs GENESIS Version 11
- Prodsmart vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Prodsmart vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Prodsmart vs JobBOSS²
- Prodsmart vs Oden Technologies
- Prodsmart vs GrabCAD Print
- Prodsmart vs Kepware Server
- Prodsmart vs Litmus Edge
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Tulip
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs MachineMetrics
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs TrakSYS
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Authentise
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oqton
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Flow Software
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs QAD Redzone
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs 3YOURMIND
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Sight Machine
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Guidewheel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ProShop ERP
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Ignition
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs LabVIEW
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ABB 800xA
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs AVEVA System Platform
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Hippo CMMS
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GENESIS Version 11
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs JobBOSS²
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oden Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GrabCAD Print
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Kepware Server
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Litmus Edge
