Softwr

Manufacturing · head to head

TrakSYS vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP

TrakSYS logo

TrakSYS

Manufacturing

Manufacturing execution and plant performance platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Yokogawa CENTUM VP logo

Yokogawa CENTUM VP

Manufacturing

Distributed control system for continuous process plants with a documented 30-year upgrade path

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: TrakSYS configuration is the implementation, so deployment is a project measured in months and needs a partner or trained staff; Yokogawa CENTUM VP there is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
  • They diverge on capability: TrakSYS covers Real-time production tracking, Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which TrakSYS and Yokogawa CENTUM VP actually diverge.

Attributes where TrakSYS and Yokogawa CENTUM VP differ
AttributeTrakSYSYokogawa CENTUM VP
PlatformsWindows, Web, Self-hostedWindows, On-premise

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in TrakSYS

  • Real-time production tracking
  • OEE and downtime analysis
  • Configurable workflows
  • Quality management
  • Equipment connectivity
  • Reporting

Only in Yokogawa CENTUM VP

  • Field Control Station
  • N-IO
  • Human Interface Station
  • ProSafe-RS integration
  • Vnet/IP
  • Migration from CS 1000 and CS 3000
  • Exaquantum integration
  • Alarm management

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

TrakSYS

  • Plants whose processes do not fit a packaged MESnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
  • Attributing downtime to cause rather than reporting an aggregatenot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
  • Regulated production needing enforced in-process quality checksnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP

Yokogawa CENTUM VP

  • Replacing end-of-life CENTUM CS 3000 controllers during a refinery turnaround without pulling field cablingnot TrakSYS
  • Greenfield LNG train where the control and safety systems must share one operator console and one event lognot TrakSYS
  • Specialty chemicals batch plant needing sequence control with recipe management and full electronic batch recordsnot TrakSYS
  • Combined cycle power station where 99.99999 percent availability figures are written into the contractnot TrakSYS

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

TrakSYS

  • Configuration is the implementation, so deployment is a project measured in months and needs a partner or trained staff
  • Quote-only pricing with no published rates
  • Flexibility means two TrakSYS installations can look nothing alike, which makes hiring for it harder
  • Considerable overkill for a small plant tracking output in a spreadsheet

Yokogawa CENTUM VP

  • There is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
  • Engineering and commissioning routinely cost several times the hardware and software, and owners who budget from the equipment quote alone are consistently short.
  • The ecosystem is closed: controllers, I/O and diagnostics are Yokogawa, and third-party alternatives at the controller layer do not exist, so the vendor holds pricing power for the twenty years or more the plant runs.
  • Operator stations run on Windows and are tied to specific validated Windows releases, so operating system end-of-life forces console refresh cycles that are governed by Yokogawa validation rather than by your IT policy.
  • Engineering staff who know CENTUM are scarce outside Japan, the Middle East and South East Asia, and in North America and Europe you will pay a premium or depend on Yokogawa’s own services organisation for changes.

Pricing, plan by plan

TrakSYS

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the TrakSYS review.

Yokogawa CENTUM VP

On request
  • CENTUM VP$undefined/year
    • Priced as an engineered system, not a per-seat licence
    • Cost driven by I/O count, controller redundancy and number of operator stations
    • Engineering, FAT, commissioning and training quoted separately and usually exceed hardware

Which should you pick?

Choose TrakSYS if

  • You need real-time production tracking.
  • You work on Windows, Web, Self-hosted.
  • You also want oee and downtime analysis.
TrakSYS review

Choose Yokogawa CENTUM VP if

  • You need field control station.
  • You work on Windows, On-premise.
  • You also want n-io.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP review

Questions people ask

Is TrakSYS or Yokogawa CENTUM VP better?
Neither clearly leads. TrakSYS starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, TrakSYS or Yokogawa CENTUM VP?
TrakSYS starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request.
Does TrakSYS or Yokogawa CENTUM VP run on more platforms?
TrakSYS runs on Windows, Web, Self-hosted. Yokogawa CENTUM VP runs on Windows, On-premise.
What is TrakSYS best used for?
TrakSYS is most often used for plants whose processes do not fit a packaged mes, attributing downtime to cause rather than reporting an aggregate, regulated production needing enforced in-process quality checks. Of those, plants whose processes do not fit a packaged mes and attributing downtime to cause rather than reporting an aggregate are not what Yokogawa CENTUM VP is typically brought in for.
What can TrakSYS do that Yokogawa CENTUM VP cannot?
TrakSYS covers Real-time production tracking, OEE and downtime analysis, Configurable workflows, Quality management. Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station, N-IO, Human Interface Station, ProSafe-RS integration.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

TrakSYS: What does TrakSYS cost?

Quoted per site and not published; implementation is normally a substantial part of the total.

Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Can I upgrade from CENTUM CS 3000 without rewiring the plant?

Yes. Yokogawa sells migration packages that replace the controller and keep existing field wiring and marshalling, which is the main reason CENTUM installations stay CENTUM.

TrakSYS: Is it a product or a platform?

A platform. Screens and workflows are configured for the plant, which is why it fits unusual processes and why deployment is a project.

Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Is CENTUM VP sold as a subscription?

No. It is a capital purchase of hardware and licences with an annual service agreement for updates and support.

TrakSYS: When is it the wrong choice?

When a packaged MES fits your process, or when the plant is small enough that the configuration effort outweighs the gain.

Yokogawa CENTUM VP: How does it compare with Emerson DeltaV on cost?

Neither publishes prices. CENTUM tends to win on brownfield migration cost because the field wiring stays; DeltaV tends to be cheaper on small greenfield systems.

Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Do I need a separate safety system?

Yes, for SIL-rated functions. ProSafe-RS is the Yokogawa SIS and shares the CENTUM engineering database and operator console.

Share

Related pages

More on TrakSYS

More on Yokogawa CENTUM VP

Keep looking

Other head to heads