Construction · head to head
PlanSwift vs Sitemark

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PlanSwift only one published plan tier (Professional at $2,000 annually); Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- They diverge on capability: PlanSwift covers Digital takeoff, Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanSwift and Sitemark actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanSwift
- Digital takeoff
- Estimating
- Assemblies
- Reporting
- Plan viewing
- QuickBooks
- Sage
- Excel
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanSwift
- Taking off quantities from construction drawings on screennot Sitemark
- Producing material and labour estimates from digital plansnot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot PlanSwift
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot PlanSwift
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot PlanSwift
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot PlanSwift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanSwift
- Only one published plan tier (Professional at $2,000 annually)
- Annual renewal required; no monthly subscription option stated
- No multi-user or team-based pricing options published
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanSwift
$1499/year- PlanSwift Pro$1499/year
- Digital takeoff
- Estimating
- Assemblies
- PlanSwift Pro+$2099/year
- Everything in Pro
- Advanced reports
- Priority support
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanSwift if
- You need digital takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want estimating.
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanSwift or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanSwift starts at $1499/year and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanSwift or Sitemark?
- PlanSwift starts at $1499/year and Sitemark at On request.
- Does PlanSwift or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- PlanSwift runs on Windows. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is PlanSwift best used for?
- PlanSwift is most often used for taking off quantities from construction drawings on screen, producing material and labour estimates from digital plans. Of those, taking off quantities from construction drawings on screen and producing material and labour estimates from digital plans are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanSwift do that Sitemark cannot?
- PlanSwift covers Digital takeoff, Estimating, Assemblies, Reporting. Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PlanSwift: How much does PlanSwift cost?
PlanSwift Professional costs $2,000 USD per year as an annual subscription. The price includes software access, updates, support for 12 months, and 2 hours of training.
SourceSitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
PlanSwift: Does PlanSwift offer a free trial?
Yes, PlanSwift offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. This allows users to evaluate the software and its Takeoff Boost AI tools before committing to the annual subscription.
SourceSitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
PlanSwift: What is included in PlanSwift Professional?
PlanSwift Professional includes full software access, 1 year of updates and support, 2 hours of training, and Takeoff Boost, a suite of AI tools that automates measuring, counting, and scaling tasks.
SourceSitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
Sitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
Sitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- PlanSwift vs Cubit Estimating
- PlanSwift vs RIB CostX
- PlanSwift vs B2W Estimate
- PlanSwift vs Handoff
- PlanSwift vs HCSS HeavyBid
- PlanSwift vs Togal.AI
- PlanSwift vs Procore
- PlanSwift vs ArchiCAD
- PlanSwift vs Autodesk Revit
- PlanSwift vs STACK Construction Technologies
- PlanSwift vs HCSS
- PlanSwift vs Billd
- PlanSwift vs Bridgit Bravo
- PlanSwift vs Builderbox
- PlanSwift vs Buildots
- PlanSwift vs Buildxact
- PlanSwift vs Chief Architect
- PlanSwift vs SketchUp
- PlanSwift vs Reconstruct
- PlanSwift vs Dalux
- PlanSwift vs Propeller Aero
- PlanSwift vs Skydio Dock for X10
- PlanSwift vs Primavera P6
- PlanSwift vs Smartsheet
- PlanSwift vs Vectorworks Architect
- PlanSwift vs Buildertrend
- PlanSwift vs Adaptive
- PlanSwift vs Document Crunch
- PlanSwift vs GCPay
- PlanSwift vs HammerTech
- PlanSwift vs Houzz Pro
- Sitemark vs Cubit Estimating
- Sitemark vs RIB CostX
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Togal.AI
- Sitemark vs Procore
- Sitemark vs ArchiCAD
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Revit
- Sitemark vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Sitemark vs HCSS
- Sitemark vs Billd
- Sitemark vs Bridgit Bravo
- Sitemark vs Builderbox
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Buildxact
- Sitemark vs Chief Architect
- Sitemark vs SketchUp
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Houzz Pro
