Healthcare · head to head
Phreesia vs Therapixel

Phreesia
Healthcare
Patient intake, registration and payments platform for medical practices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Therapixel
Healthcare
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Phreesia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Phreesia no price is published: the vendor states pricing is customised to organisation size, workflows and products used, and is given only as a tailored quote; Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Phreesia and Therapixel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Phreesia | Therapixel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Phreesia
Nothing recorded that Therapixel does not also cover.
Only in Therapixel
- MammoScreen 2D
- MammoScreen DBT
- One to ten suspicion score
- Summary report
- Workstation and PACS delivery
- Reading workflow configurations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Phreesia
- Digital patient intake and registration ahead of an appointmentnot Therapixel
- Collecting patient payments as part of the intake workflownot Therapixel
- Automating clinical screening questionnaires at check-innot Therapixel
Therapixel
- A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot Phreesia
- An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot Phreesia
- A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot Phreesia
- A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot Phreesia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Phreesia
- No price is published: the vendor states pricing is customised to organisation size, workflows and products used, and is given only as a tailored quote
- The current free access to the Intake platform is time limited and ends on 31 December 2026, with the rate that follows undisclosed
- A buyer must book a demo before receiving any figure
Therapixel
- European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
- Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
- Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
- Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.
Pricing, plan by plan
Phreesia
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Phreesia review.
Therapixel
On request- MammoScreen$undefined/year
- Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
- 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
- Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Phreesia or Therapixel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Phreesia starts at Free and Therapixel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Phreesia or Therapixel?
- Phreesia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Phreesia and On request for Therapixel.
- Does Phreesia or Therapixel run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Phreesia for free?
- Yes. Phreesia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Therapixel starts at On request.
- What is Phreesia best used for?
- Phreesia is most often used for digital patient intake and registration ahead of an appointment, collecting patient payments as part of the intake workflow, automating clinical screening questionnaires at check-in. Of those, digital patient intake and registration ahead of an appointment and collecting patient payments as part of the intake workflow are not what Therapixel is typically brought in for.
- What can Phreesia do that Therapixel cannot?
- Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Phreesia: Is there a free version of Phreesia?
Phreesia offers free access to the complete Phreesia Intake platform through December 31, 2026. Standard subscription pricing begins January 1, 2027, with transparent pricing and no per-message charges or hidden fees.
SourceTherapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?
Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.
Phreesia: How is Phreesia priced?
Phreesia pricing is customized based on organization size, workflows, and products used. The company offers transparent subscription pricing with no per-message charges. Specific pricing requires contacting the company via their demo request form for a tailored quote.
SourceTherapixel: Is it CE marked?
Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.
Therapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?
It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.
Therapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?
No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Phreesia vs Athenahealth
- Phreesia vs Epic Systems
- Phreesia vs Cerner
- Phreesia vs Amwell
- Phreesia vs DrChrono
- Phreesia vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Phreesia vs Kareo
- Phreesia vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Phreesia vs ChiroTouch
- Phreesia vs NextGen Healthcare
- Phreesia vs Practice Fusion
- Phreesia vs Teladoc Health
- Phreesia vs Ambra Health
- Phreesia vs BestRx
- Phreesia vs Liberty Software
- Phreesia vs Lunit
- Phreesia vs Kareo Clinical
- Phreesia vs Aidoc
- Phreesia vs Gleamer
- Phreesia vs Techcyte
- Phreesia vs Paige
- Phreesia vs PathAI
- Phreesia vs Clue
- Phreesia vs Rx30
- Phreesia vs Annalise.ai
- Phreesia vs Quantum Health
- Phreesia vs Sysmex
- Phreesia vs Epocrates
- Phreesia vs Figure 1
- Phreesia vs Fullscript
- Phreesia vs GNU Health
- Phreesia vs GoodRx
- Phreesia vs Halaxy
- Therapixel vs Athenahealth
- Therapixel vs Epic Systems
- Therapixel vs Cerner
- Therapixel vs Amwell
- Therapixel vs DrChrono
- Therapixel vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Therapixel vs Kareo
- Therapixel vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Therapixel vs ChiroTouch
- Therapixel vs NextGen Healthcare
- Therapixel vs Practice Fusion
- Therapixel vs Teladoc Health
- Therapixel vs Ambra Health
- Therapixel vs BestRx
- Therapixel vs Liberty Software
- Therapixel vs Lunit
- Therapixel vs Kareo Clinical
- Therapixel vs Aidoc
- Therapixel vs Gleamer
- Therapixel vs Techcyte
- Therapixel vs Paige
- Therapixel vs PathAI
- Therapixel vs Clue
- Therapixel vs Rx30
- Therapixel vs Annalise.ai
- Therapixel vs Quantum Health
- Therapixel vs Sysmex
- Therapixel vs Epocrates
- Therapixel vs Figure 1
- Therapixel vs Fullscript
- Therapixel vs GNU Health
- Therapixel vs GoodRx
- Therapixel vs Halaxy
