Healthcare · head to head
Cerner vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS

Cerner
Healthcare
Health information technology solutions for healthcare organizations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Healthcare
Enterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cerner no published pricing on vendor website; enterprise healthcare software requires custom quotes; Philips IntelliSpace PACS philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.
- They diverge on capability: Cerner covers Electronic Health Records, Philips IntelliSpace PACS covers Diagnostic reading client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cerner and Philips IntelliSpace PACS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cerner | Philips IntelliSpace PACS |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows |
| Founded | 1979 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cerner
- Electronic Health Records
- Revenue Cycle
- Population Health
- Patient Engagement
- HL7
- FHIR
- Lab Systems
- HIPAA
Only in Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Diagnostic reading client
- Zero footprint web viewer
- Enterprise archive
- Advanced visualisation
- IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS
- Worklist and workflow
- AI results integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cerner
- Hospital and acute care EHR for chart review and clinical documentationnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devicesnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- A hospital replacing an end of life PACS that already runs a large Philips CT and MR estate and wants modality and reading integration in one support contractnot Cerner
- A radiology group consolidating several departmental archives into one enterprise archive with a single radiologist worklistnot Cerner
- A health system that wants to move diagnostic reading off local workstations into a cloud hosted environment via the AWS listingnot Cerner
- Sites that need server side advanced visualisation so radiologists can do 3D and vessel work without dedicated 3D workstationsnot Cerner
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cerner
- No published pricing on vendor website; enterprise healthcare software requires custom quotes
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.
- Advanced visualisation is licensed by concurrent user separately from the base PACS, so a department that sizes concurrency from average use finds radiologists blocked at the morning peak and buys more licences after go live.
- The deepest integration is with Philips modalities, so sites running mixed GE and Siemens scanner fleets get less of the workflow benefit than the demonstration environment implies.
- Third party AI findings arrive through a results interface rather than natively in the hanging protocol, so radiologists context switch to see algorithm output and adoption of purchased AI is lower than expected.
- Data migration from a legacy PACS is a separate, large and often underquoted professional services line, and migrations of a decade of priors routinely run longer than the go live plan allows.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cerner
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Cerner review.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
On request- IntelliSpace PACS$undefined/year
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Advanced visualisation licensed separately by concurrent user
- Storage and archive tiering priced by capacity
Which should you pick?
Choose Cerner if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want revenue cycle.
Choose Philips IntelliSpace PACS if
- You need diagnostic reading client.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want zero footprint web viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Cerner or Philips IntelliSpace PACS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cerner starts at On request and Philips IntelliSpace PACS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cerner or Philips IntelliSpace PACS?
- Cerner starts at On request and Philips IntelliSpace PACS at On request.
- Does Cerner or Philips IntelliSpace PACS run on more platforms?
- Cerner runs on Web, iOS, Android. Philips IntelliSpace PACS runs on Web, Windows.
- What is Cerner best used for?
- Cerner is most often used for hospital and acute care ehr for chart review and clinical documentation, mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devices. Of those, hospital and acute care ehr for chart review and clinical documentation and mobile clinical access for physicians and care teams on point-of-care devices are not what Philips IntelliSpace PACS is typically brought in for.
- What can Cerner do that Philips IntelliSpace PACS cannot?
- Cerner covers Electronic Health Records, Revenue Cycle, Population Health, Patient Engagement. Philips IntelliSpace PACS covers Diagnostic reading client, Zero footprint web viewer, Enterprise archive, Advanced visualisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cerner: Does Cerner publish its pricing?
No, Cerner does not publish standard pricing. As an enterprise healthcare EHR vendor (now acquired by Oracle), pricing is customized per healthcare organization based on size, bed capacity, modules required, and implementation scope. Contact Oracle Health for pricing.
SourcePhilips IntelliSpace PACS: Is IntelliSpace PACS being discontinued?
It is still sold and supported, but Philips has moved its marketing to Philips Enterprise Imaging and some regional IntelliSpace product pages now redirect. Ask Philips for the written lifecycle statement before signing a multi year term.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Can I run it in the cloud?
Yes. Philips lists IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS Marketplace, and Philips also offers a managed hosted deployment. Both are quoted rather than self service.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Does Philips publish pricing?
No. Pricing is by study volume, concurrent diagnostic users and storage, and is usually negotiated alongside modality capital.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Will it read images from non Philips scanners?
Yes, it is a standard DICOM archive and viewer. The gap is in advanced visualisation and modality workflow integration, which is deeper on Philips equipment.
Related pages
More on Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Other head to heads
- Cerner vs Epic Systems
- Cerner vs Meditech
- Cerner vs Allscripts
- Cerner vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Cerner vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Cerner vs eClinicalWorks
- Cerner vs Athenahealth
- Cerner vs Dentrix
- Cerner vs PioneerRx
- Cerner vs Rad AI
- Cerner vs Aidoc
- Cerner vs Annalise.ai
- Cerner vs Doctor on Demand
- Cerner vs Epic MyChart
- Cerner vs NextGen Healthcare
- Cerner vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Cerner vs athenaOne
- Cerner vs Rx30
- Cerner vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Cerner vs Ambra Health
- Cerner vs Sectra
- Cerner vs Visage Imaging
- Cerner vs Gleamer
- Cerner vs Figure 1
- Cerner vs Lunit
- Cerner vs Liberty Software
- Cerner vs Flo
- Cerner vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Cerner vs Included Health
- Cerner vs Kareo
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Epic Systems
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Meditech
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Allscripts
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs eClinicalWorks
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Athenahealth
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Dentrix
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs PioneerRx
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Rad AI
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Aidoc
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Annalise.ai
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Doctor on Demand
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Epic MyChart
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs NextGen Healthcare
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs athenaOne
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Rx30
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Ambra Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Sectra
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Visage Imaging
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Gleamer
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Figure 1
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Lunit
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Liberty Software
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Flo
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Included Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Kareo
