Healthcare · head to head
Flo vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS

Flo
Healthcare
Period and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Healthcare
Enterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Flo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Flo flo Health settled with the US FTC in 2021 over allegations it shared sensitive health data, including pregnancy and menstruation details, with Facebook, Google and other third parties despite telling users the data would stay private, a fact directly relevant to how much a user should trust current privacy claims without independently checking the published policy.; Philips IntelliSpace PACS philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.
- They diverge on capability: Flo covers Cycle and ovulation tracking, Philips IntelliSpace PACS covers Diagnostic reading client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flo and Philips IntelliSpace PACS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Flo | Philips IntelliSpace PACS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Free with a Premium subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, Windows |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flo
- Cycle and ovulation tracking
- Pregnancy mode
- Anonymous Mode
- Symptom and mood logging
- Expert content library
- Community and forums
Only in Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Diagnostic reading client
- Zero footprint web viewer
- Enterprise archive
- Advanced visualisation
- IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS
- Worklist and workflow
- AI results integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flo
- Someone tracking cycle and ovulation who wants to weigh app convenience against the sensitivity of the data being loggednot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- A user in a jurisdiction with legal risk around reproductive health data who wants to check Anonymous Mode and current data sharing policy before logging pregnancy or fertility attemptsnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- A buyer wanting to compare Flo directly against Clue on published data practices before choosing which app to trust with this informationnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Someone who wants pregnancy tracking content alongside cycle tracking in one app rather than switching apps mid-pregnancynot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- A hospital replacing an end of life PACS that already runs a large Philips CT and MR estate and wants modality and reading integration in one support contractnot Flo
- A radiology group consolidating several departmental archives into one enterprise archive with a single radiologist worklistnot Flo
- A health system that wants to move diagnostic reading off local workstations into a cloud hosted environment via the AWS listingnot Flo
- Sites that need server side advanced visualisation so radiologists can do 3D and vessel work without dedicated 3D workstationsnot Flo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flo
- Flo Health settled with the US FTC in 2021 over allegations it shared sensitive health data, including pregnancy and menstruation details, with Facebook, Google and other third parties despite telling users the data would stay private, a fact directly relevant to how much a user should trust current privacy claims without independently checking the published policy.
- Reproductive health data, including logged periods, fertility attempts and pregnancy status, has been the subject of law enforcement data requests in some jurisdictions following changes to reproductive rights law, and cloud-stored logs are a real category of exposure regardless of a vendors intentions.
- Anonymous Mode, the privacy feature introduced after the settlement, is a setting that must be checked and understood rather than assumed, and its exact scope and default status should be verified in the current privacy policy rather than taken from marketing copy.
- Free tier predictions rely on self-reported symptom data and general population models, so accuracy for irregular cycles or specific medical conditions is limited compared with clinical tracking.
- The subscription auto-renews and, like most mobile subscriptions, must be cancelled through app store account settings rather than inside the app itself.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.
- Advanced visualisation is licensed by concurrent user separately from the base PACS, so a department that sizes concurrency from average use finds radiologists blocked at the morning peak and buys more licences after go live.
- The deepest integration is with Philips modalities, so sites running mixed GE and Siemens scanner fleets get less of the workflow benefit than the demonstration environment implies.
- Third party AI findings arrive through a results interface rather than natively in the hanging protocol, so radiologists context switch to see algorithm output and adoption of purchased AI is lower than expected.
- Data migration from a legacy PACS is a separate, large and often underquoted professional services line, and migrations of a decade of priors routinely run longer than the go live plan allows.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flo
Free- Flo Premium$11.99/month
- Free tier covers core cycle tracking, predictions and symptom logging
- Premium adds deeper personalised insights and expert content, around $11.99 a month
- Annual and lifetime purchase options typically offered at a lower effective rate
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
On request- IntelliSpace PACS$undefined/year
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Advanced visualisation licensed separately by concurrent user
- Storage and archive tiering priced by capacity
Which should you pick?
Choose Flo if
- You need cycle and ovulation tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want pregnancy mode.
Choose Philips IntelliSpace PACS if
- You need diagnostic reading client.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want zero footprint web viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Flo or Philips IntelliSpace PACS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flo starts at Free and Philips IntelliSpace PACS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flo or Philips IntelliSpace PACS?
- Flo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Flo and On request for Philips IntelliSpace PACS.
- Does Flo or Philips IntelliSpace PACS run on more platforms?
- Flo runs on iOS, Android, Web. Philips IntelliSpace PACS runs on Web, Windows.
- Can I use Flo for free?
- Yes. Flo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Philips IntelliSpace PACS starts at On request.
- What is Flo best used for?
- Flo is most often used for someone tracking cycle and ovulation who wants to weigh app convenience against the sensitivity of the data being logged, a user in a jurisdiction with legal risk around reproductive health data who wants to check anonymous mode and current data sharing policy before logging pregnancy or fertility attempts, a buyer wanting to compare flo directly against clue on published data practices before choosing which app to trust with this information, someone who wants pregnancy tracking content alongside cycle tracking in one app rather than switching apps mid-pregnancy. Of those, someone tracking cycle and ovulation who wants to weigh app convenience against the sensitivity of the data being logged and a user in a jurisdiction with legal risk around reproductive health data who wants to check anonymous mode and current data sharing policy before logging pregnancy or fertility attempts are not what Philips IntelliSpace PACS is typically brought in for.
- What can Flo do that Philips IntelliSpace PACS cannot?
- Flo covers Cycle and ovulation tracking, Pregnancy mode, Anonymous Mode, Symptom and mood logging. Philips IntelliSpace PACS covers Diagnostic reading client, Zero footprint web viewer, Enterprise archive, Advanced visualisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flo: What happened with the FTC in 2021?
The US FTC alleged Flo Health shared sensitive health data, including pregnancy and menstruation details, with third parties like Facebook and Google despite promising to keep it private. Flo settled without admitting liability, agreeing to obtain consent for future sharing and to an independent privacy review.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Is IntelliSpace PACS being discontinued?
It is still sold and supported, but Philips has moved its marketing to Philips Enterprise Imaging and some regional IntelliSpace product pages now redirect. Ask Philips for the written lifecycle statement before signing a multi year term.
Flo: What is Anonymous Mode?
A privacy setting Flo states disconnects entered health data from an identifiable profile. Check the current app and privacy policy for whether it is on by default or must be turned on manually, since this affects what data is linked to your identity.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Can I run it in the cloud?
Yes. Philips lists IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS Marketplace, and Philips also offers a managed hosted deployment. Both are quoted rather than self service.
Flo: Is Flo free?
Core cycle tracking and predictions are free. Deeper personalised insights and expert content require Flo Premium.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Does Philips publish pricing?
No. Pricing is by study volume, concurrent diagnostic users and storage, and is usually negotiated alongside modality capital.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Will it read images from non Philips scanners?
Yes, it is a standard DICOM archive and viewer. The gap is in advanced visualisation and modality workflow integration, which is deeper on Philips equipment.
Related pages
More on Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Other head to heads
- Flo vs Clue
- Flo vs Woebot Health
- Flo vs Rad AI
- Flo vs Healthie
- Flo vs Cerner
- Flo vs Sectra
- Flo vs Liberty Software
- Flo vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Flo vs OpenMRS
- Flo vs DHIS2
- Flo vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Flo vs Meditech
- Flo vs Healthgrades
- Flo vs Hinge Health
- Flo vs MDLive
- Flo vs Medscape
- Flo vs Ambra Health
- Flo vs Aidoc
- Flo vs Epic Systems
- Flo vs Visage Imaging
- Flo vs Gleamer
- Flo vs Annalise.ai
- Flo vs Figure 1
- Flo vs Lunit
- Flo vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Flo vs Included Health
- Flo vs Kareo
- Flo vs Epic MyChart
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Clue
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Woebot Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Rad AI
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Healthie
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Cerner
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Sectra
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Liberty Software
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs OpenMRS
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs DHIS2
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Meditech
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Healthgrades
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Hinge Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs MDLive
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Medscape
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Ambra Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Aidoc
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Epic Systems
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Visage Imaging
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Gleamer
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Annalise.ai
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Figure 1
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Lunit
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Included Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Kareo
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Epic MyChart
