Healthcare · head to head
athenaOne vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS

athenaOne
Healthcare
Unified cloud platform combining EHR, practice management, and patient engagement
- From
- $250/month
- Rated
- -

Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Healthcare
Enterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: athenaOne no published pricing on homepage, pricing available through request for demo only; Philips IntelliSpace PACS philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.
- They diverge on capability: athenaOne covers Electronic Health Records, Philips IntelliSpace PACS covers Diagnostic reading client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which athenaOne and Philips IntelliSpace PACS actually diverge.
| Attribute | athenaOne | Philips IntelliSpace PACS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $250/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile, Api | Web, Windows |
| Founded | 1997 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in athenaOne
- Electronic Health Records
- Practice Management
- Patient Engagement
- Care Coordination
- Analytics
- Mobile App
- Telehealth
- Labs
Only in Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Diagnostic reading client
- Zero footprint web viewer
- Enterprise archive
- Advanced visualisation
- IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS
- Worklist and workflow
- AI results integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
athenaOne
- Patient Carenot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Medical Recordsnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Practice Managementnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Telehealthnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- A hospital replacing an end of life PACS that already runs a large Philips CT and MR estate and wants modality and reading integration in one support contractnot athenaOne
- A radiology group consolidating several departmental archives into one enterprise archive with a single radiologist worklistnot athenaOne
- A health system that wants to move diagnostic reading off local workstations into a cloud hosted environment via the AWS listingnot athenaOne
- Sites that need server side advanced visualisation so radiologists can do 3D and vessel work without dedicated 3D workstationsnot athenaOne
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
athenaOne
- No published pricing on homepage, pricing available through request for demo only
- Healthcare EHR systems typically require enterprise-level contracts
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.
- Advanced visualisation is licensed by concurrent user separately from the base PACS, so a department that sizes concurrency from average use finds radiologists blocked at the morning peak and buys more licences after go live.
- The deepest integration is with Philips modalities, so sites running mixed GE and Siemens scanner fleets get less of the workflow benefit than the demonstration environment implies.
- Third party AI findings arrive through a results interface rather than natively in the hanging protocol, so radiologists context switch to see algorithm output and adoption of purchased AI is lower than expected.
- Data migration from a legacy PACS is a separate, large and often underquoted professional services line, and migrations of a decade of priors routinely run longer than the go live plan allows.
Pricing, plan by plan
athenaOne
$250/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the athenaOne review.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS
On request- IntelliSpace PACS$undefined/year
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Advanced visualisation licensed separately by concurrent user
- Storage and archive tiering priced by capacity
Which should you pick?
Choose athenaOne if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want practice management.
Choose Philips IntelliSpace PACS if
- You need diagnostic reading client.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want zero footprint web viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is athenaOne or Philips IntelliSpace PACS better?
- Neither clearly leads. athenaOne starts at $250/month and Philips IntelliSpace PACS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, athenaOne or Philips IntelliSpace PACS?
- athenaOne starts at $250/month and Philips IntelliSpace PACS at On request.
- Does athenaOne or Philips IntelliSpace PACS run on more platforms?
- athenaOne runs on Web, Mobile, Api. Philips IntelliSpace PACS runs on Web, Windows.
- What is athenaOne best used for?
- athenaOne is most often used for patient care, medical records, practice management, telehealth. Of those, patient care and medical records are not what Philips IntelliSpace PACS is typically brought in for.
- What can athenaOne do that Philips IntelliSpace PACS cannot?
- athenaOne covers Electronic Health Records, Practice Management, Patient Engagement, Care Coordination. Philips IntelliSpace PACS covers Diagnostic reading client, Zero footprint web viewer, Enterprise archive, Advanced visualisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
athenaOne: What does athenaOne cost?
athenaOne does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must contact their sales team or schedule a demo to receive a customized quote based on practice size, specialty, and required features.
SourcePhilips IntelliSpace PACS: Is IntelliSpace PACS being discontinued?
It is still sold and supported, but Philips has moved its marketing to Philips Enterprise Imaging and some regional IntelliSpace product pages now redirect. Ask Philips for the written lifecycle statement before signing a multi year term.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Can I run it in the cloud?
Yes. Philips lists IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS Marketplace, and Philips also offers a managed hosted deployment. Both are quoted rather than self service.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Does Philips publish pricing?
No. Pricing is by study volume, concurrent diagnostic users and storage, and is usually negotiated alongside modality capital.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Will it read images from non Philips scanners?
Yes, it is a standard DICOM archive and viewer. The gap is in advanced visualisation and modality workflow integration, which is deeper on Philips equipment.
Related pages
More on Philips IntelliSpace PACS
Other head to heads
- athenaOne vs Epic Systems
- athenaOne vs Cerner
- athenaOne vs Amwell
- athenaOne vs Healthie
- athenaOne vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- athenaOne vs ChiroTouch
- athenaOne vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- athenaOne vs NextGen Healthcare
- athenaOne vs DrChrono
- athenaOne vs WebPT
- athenaOne vs Kareo Clinical
- athenaOne vs Lunit
- athenaOne vs PioneerRx
- athenaOne vs Rad AI
- athenaOne vs Aidoc
- athenaOne vs eClinicalWorks
- athenaOne vs Rx30
- athenaOne vs Fujifilm Synapse
- athenaOne vs Ambra Health
- athenaOne vs Sectra
- athenaOne vs Visage Imaging
- athenaOne vs Gleamer
- athenaOne vs Annalise.ai
- athenaOne vs Figure 1
- athenaOne vs Liberty Software
- athenaOne vs Flo
- athenaOne vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- athenaOne vs Included Health
- athenaOne vs Kareo
- athenaOne vs Epic MyChart
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Epic Systems
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Cerner
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Amwell
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Healthie
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs ChiroTouch
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs NextGen Healthcare
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs DrChrono
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs WebPT
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Kareo Clinical
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Lunit
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs PioneerRx
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Rad AI
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Aidoc
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs eClinicalWorks
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Rx30
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Ambra Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Sectra
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Visage Imaging
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Gleamer
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Annalise.ai
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Figure 1
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Liberty Software
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Flo
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Included Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Kareo
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Epic MyChart
