Government · head to head
OnBase vs Signicat

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OnBase pricing starts at 2,000 USD per month, making it expensive for small agencies; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: OnBase covers Content Management, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OnBase and Signicat actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OnBase
- Content Management
- Workflow Automation
- Case Management
- Records Management
- Intelligent Capture
- Microsoft 365
- Salesforce
- Epic
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OnBase
- Citizen Servicesnot Signicat
- Records Managementnot Signicat
- Public Safetynot Signicat
- Civic Engagementnot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot OnBase
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot OnBase
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot OnBase
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot OnBase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OnBase
- Pricing starts at 2,000 USD per month, making it expensive for small agencies
- Complex implementation and configuration required for government-specific workflows
- Requires significant IT resources for deployment and ongoing management
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
OnBase
$400/month- Government$400/month
- Content Management
- Process Automation
- Case Management
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose OnBase if
- You need content management.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want workflow automation.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is OnBase or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. OnBase starts at $400/month and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OnBase or Signicat?
- OnBase starts at $400/month and Signicat at On request.
- Does OnBase or Signicat run on more platforms?
- OnBase runs on Web, Mobile. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is OnBase best used for?
- OnBase is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can OnBase do that Signicat cannot?
- OnBase covers Content Management, Workflow Automation, Case Management, Records Management. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OnBase: What is OnBase used for in government?
OnBase is used for digital permitting, inspections, and plan review processes. Government agencies use it to streamline workflows, enable online forms, automate approvals, and provide citizen access to application status.
SourceSignicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
OnBase: Does OnBase support mobile access?
Yes. Mobile access is a key feature of OnBase, allowing users to manage documents and cases on the go.
SourceSignicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
OnBase: What document management capabilities does OnBase provide?
OnBase provides centralized document storage with version control, search and retrieval tools, records management across physical and electronic lifecycles, and compliance with policies and regulations.
SourceSignicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
OnBase: Can OnBase workflows be customized?
Yes. OnBase is flexible and configurable with user-defined workflows for case management, streamlining processes like accounts payable, employee onboarding, and contract management.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- OnBase vs DocuWare
- OnBase vs Laserfiche
- OnBase vs Accela
- OnBase vs CityView
- OnBase vs ClearGov
- OnBase vs VUEWorks
- OnBase vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- OnBase vs GovPilot
- OnBase vs SAP for Government
- OnBase vs Workday Government
- OnBase vs CivicPlus
- OnBase vs Granicus
- OnBase vs CKAN
- OnBase vs Clariti
- OnBase vs DataSF
- OnBase vs Google Cloud for Government
- OnBase vs GovQA
- OnBase vs Jumio
- OnBase vs Sumsub
- OnBase vs IDnow
- OnBase vs Trulioo
- OnBase vs Veriff
- OnBase vs iDenfy
- OnBase vs Yoti
- OnBase vs Shufti Pro
- OnBase vs Socure
- OnBase vs March Networks
- OnBase vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- OnBase vs Semperis
- OnBase vs MetricStream
- OnBase vs Microsoft Defender
- OnBase vs Mimecast
- OnBase vs Motorola Vigilant
- OnBase vs Nessus
- OnBase vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs DocuWare
- Signicat vs Laserfiche
- Signicat vs Accela
- Signicat vs CityView
- Signicat vs ClearGov
- Signicat vs VUEWorks
- Signicat vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Signicat vs GovPilot
- Signicat vs SAP for Government
- Signicat vs Workday Government
- Signicat vs CivicPlus
- Signicat vs Granicus
- Signicat vs CKAN
- Signicat vs Clariti
- Signicat vs DataSF
- Signicat vs Google Cloud for Government
- Signicat vs GovQA
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel

