Cybersecurity · head to head
iDenfy vs Signicat

iDenfy
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening bundled into a single per-verification price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: iDenfy rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: iDenfy covers Human review on all cases, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which iDenfy and Signicat actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in iDenfy
- Human review on all cases
- Business verification
- Proof of address
- NFC chip reading
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
Both cover
- Document verification
- AML screening
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
iDenfy
- A European fintech that needs KYC and AML screening and wants one price rather than four line itemsnot Signicat
- A gambling operator in a regulated EU market needing age and identity assurance with EU data processingnot Signicat
- A crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors requirenot Signicat
- A marketplace wanting NFC passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contractnot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot iDenfy
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot iDenfy
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot iDenfy
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot iDenfy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
iDenfy
- Rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.
- It is a smaller vendor than the market leaders, which makes it a harder sell through enterprise vendor-risk review even when the product performs well.
- Human review on every case caps throughput in a way fully automated competitors are not constrained by, which shows up as latency during volume spikes.
- Coverage and accuracy are strongest on European documents; performance on some Asian, African and Latin American document types trails specialists in those regions.
- The bundled AML screening uses its chosen data sources, so institutions mandated to use a specific list provider such as Dow Jones cannot substitute it and end up paying twice.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
iDenfy
On request- iDenfy Verification$undefined/verification
- Volume-tiered per-verification rates quoted on request
- AML screening bundled rather than charged per check
- No monthly minimum advertised
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose iDenfy if
- You need human review on all cases.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want business verification.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is iDenfy or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. iDenfy starts at On request and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, iDenfy or Signicat?
- iDenfy starts at On request and Signicat at On request.
- Does iDenfy or Signicat run on more platforms?
- iDenfy runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is iDenfy best used for?
- iDenfy is most often used for a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items, a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing, a crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors require, a marketplace wanting nfc passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contract. Of those, a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items and a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can iDenfy do that Signicat cannot?
- iDenfy covers Human review on all cases, Business verification, Proof of address, NFC chip reading. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Authentication, Digital onboarding flows. Both handle Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
iDenfy: Is AML screening included in the verification price?
That is the pitch, screening bundled rather than sold as a per-check add-on. Confirm which sanctions and PEP data sources are behind it before you rely on it.
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
iDenfy: Is there a monthly minimum?
iDenfy markets itself as having no monthly minimum, in contrast to competitors charging $49 to $299 a month. Get that in writing in the contract.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
iDenfy: Where is data processed?
iDenfy is established in Lithuania and processes in the EU, which simplifies GDPR transfer assessments compared with United States-headquartered vendors.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- iDenfy vs Veriff
- iDenfy vs IDnow
- iDenfy vs Yoti
- iDenfy vs Sumsub
- iDenfy vs Jumio
- iDenfy vs Shufti Pro
- iDenfy vs Trulioo
- iDenfy vs Socure
- iDenfy vs Fenergo
- iDenfy vs Quantexa
- iDenfy vs NICE Actimize
- iDenfy vs Sardine
- iDenfy vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- iDenfy vs VMware Carbon Black
- iDenfy vs Wireshark
- iDenfy vs WorkOS
- iDenfy vs Zscaler Internet Access
- iDenfy vs Milestone XProtect
- iDenfy vs March Networks
- iDenfy vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- iDenfy vs Semperis
- iDenfy vs MetricStream
- iDenfy vs Microsoft Defender
- iDenfy vs Mimecast
- iDenfy vs Motorola Vigilant
- iDenfy vs Nessus
- iDenfy vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs Fenergo
- Signicat vs Quantexa
- Signicat vs NICE Actimize
- Signicat vs Sardine
- Signicat vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Signicat vs VMware Carbon Black
- Signicat vs Wireshark
- Signicat vs WorkOS
- Signicat vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Signicat vs Milestone XProtect
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
