Developer Tools · head to head
Hookdeck vs Resolver

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Hookdeck has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hookdeck pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hookdeck and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot Resolver
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot Resolver
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot Resolver
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Hookdeck
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Hookdeck
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Hookdeck
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Hookdeck
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone.
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once.
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead.
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/month
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/month
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Hookdeck or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hookdeck starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hookdeck or Resolver?
- Hookdeck has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Hookdeck and On request for Resolver.
- Does Hookdeck or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Hookdeck for free?
- Yes. Hookdeck has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Hookdeck best used for?
- Hookdeck is most often used for a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled, fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately, debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fix, receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnel. Of those, a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled and fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Hookdeck do that Resolver cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Hookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Hookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Hookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Visual Studio Code
- Hookdeck vs Daytona
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs Ansible
- Hookdeck vs Argo CD
- Hookdeck vs Atlantis
- Hookdeck vs Blacksmith
- Hookdeck vs Coder
- Hookdeck vs LogicManager
- Hookdeck vs Diligent
- Hookdeck vs MetricStream
- Hookdeck vs NICE Actimize
- Hookdeck vs Omada Identity
- Hookdeck vs Sardine
- Hookdeck vs Silent Eight
- Hookdeck vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Hookdeck vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Hookdeck vs OneTrust
- Hookdeck vs Rhombus Systems
- Hookdeck vs Trulioo
- Hookdeck vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Hookdeck vs ExpressVPN
- Hookdeck vs Falco
- Hookdeck vs Fenergo
- Hookdeck vs Google Authenticator
- Hookdeck vs Grype
- Resolver vs Jitsu
- Resolver vs Spacelift
- Resolver vs Garden
- Resolver vs Webpack
- Resolver vs Backstage
- Resolver vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Resolver vs Dagger
- Resolver vs Okteto
- Resolver vs Visual Studio Code
- Resolver vs Daytona
- Resolver vs Harness
- Resolver vs Ansible
- Resolver vs Argo CD
- Resolver vs Atlantis
- Resolver vs Blacksmith
- Resolver vs Coder
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
