Cybersecurity · head to head
NICE Actimize vs PublicInput

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

PublicInput
Government
Inclusive Community Engagement
- From
- $400/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- PublicInput starts at $400/mo; NICE Actimize prices on request.
- Only NICE Actimize lists suspicious activity monitoring; only PublicInput lists virtual Public Meetings.
- Where NICE Actimize falls short: tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- Where PublicInput falls short: all three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NICE Actimize and PublicInput actually diverge.
| Attribute | NICE Actimize | PublicInput |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $400/month |
| Pricing model | Quote | Subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: free tier (No).
Not yet recorded: founded for NICE Actimize.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
Only in PublicInput
- Virtual Public Meetings
- Online Surveys
- Comment Management
- Multi-language Support
- Engagement Analytics
- Zoom
- Microsoft Teams
- GovDelivery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot PublicInput
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot PublicInput
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot PublicInput
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot PublicInput
PublicInput
- Civic engagementnot NICE Actimize
- Government consultationnot NICE Actimize
- Public input collectionnot NICE Actimize
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour
PublicInput
- All three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- HTML and CSS customization, custom workflows and approvals, and external system integration with Accela and ESRI are listed as Enterprise Capabilities rather than core platform features
- Public meetings functionality is sold under a separate Meetings plan rather than being included with the Engagement plans
- Getting a plan requires booking a consultation and a tailored demo rather than self serve signup
Pricing, plan by plan
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE ActimizeOn request
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
PublicInput
$400/month- Enterprise$400/mo
- Virtual Meetings
- Surveys
- Comment Management
Which should you pick?
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Choose PublicInput if
- You need virtual public meetings.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want online surveys.
Questions people ask
- Is NICE Actimize or PublicInput better?
- Neither clearly leads. NICE Actimize starts at On request and PublicInput at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NICE Actimize or PublicInput?
- NICE Actimize starts at On request and PublicInput at $400/month.
- Does NICE Actimize or PublicInput run on more platforms?
- NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows. PublicInput runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is NICE Actimize best used for?
- NICE Actimize is most often used for a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise, a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications, a regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governance, a payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch aml monitoring. Of those, a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise and a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications are not what PublicInput is typically brought in for.
- What can NICE Actimize do that PublicInput cannot?
- NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection. PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings, Online Surveys, Comment Management, Multi-language Support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
PublicInput: How much does PublicInput cost?
PublicInput does not publish pricing on their website. Customers must request a demo or book a meeting to receive a quote based on their specific needs.
SourceNICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
PublicInput: What pricing plans does PublicInput offer?
PublicInput offers Engagement Plans and Meetings Plans, but specific pricing for each plan is not publicly available and requires contacting their sales team.
SourceNICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Related pages
More on NICE Actimize
More on PublicInput
Other head to heads
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Passbolt
- NICE Actimize vs Ping Identity
- NICE Actimize vs Proofpoint
- NICE Actimize vs Qualys VMDR
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs Polco
- NICE Actimize vs Zencity
- NICE Actimize vs CivicPlus
- NICE Actimize vs Granicus
- NICE Actimize vs Nextdoor for Government
- NICE Actimize vs CityView
- NICE Actimize vs Accela
- NICE Actimize vs CentralSquare
- NICE Actimize vs RecDesk
- NICE Actimize vs CitizenLab
- NICE Actimize vs Clariti
- NICE Actimize vs mySidewalk
- NICE Actimize vs NEOGOV
- NICE Actimize vs OpenCities
- NICE Actimize vs Oracle Government Cloud
- NICE Actimize vs Palantir Gotham
- NICE Actimize vs Periscope Holdings
- NICE Actimize vs Bang the Table
- PublicInput vs Silent Eight
- PublicInput vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- PublicInput vs Quantexa
- PublicInput vs Feedzai
- PublicInput vs Unit21
- PublicInput vs Fenergo
- PublicInput vs Sardine
- PublicInput vs ThetaRay
- PublicInput vs Transmit Security
- PublicInput vs Socure
- PublicInput vs Sumsub
- PublicInput vs Jumio
- PublicInput vs Passbolt
- PublicInput vs Ping Identity
- PublicInput vs Proofpoint
- PublicInput vs Qualys VMDR
- PublicInput vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- PublicInput vs Recorded Future
- PublicInput vs Polco
- PublicInput vs Zencity
- PublicInput vs CivicPlus
- PublicInput vs Granicus
- PublicInput vs Nextdoor for Government
- PublicInput vs CityView
- PublicInput vs Accela
- PublicInput vs CentralSquare
- PublicInput vs RecDesk
- PublicInput vs CitizenLab
- PublicInput vs Clariti
- PublicInput vs mySidewalk
- PublicInput vs NEOGOV
- PublicInput vs OpenCities
- PublicInput vs Oracle Government Cloud
- PublicInput vs Palantir Gotham
- PublicInput vs Periscope Holdings
- PublicInput vs Bang the Table
