Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub vs PublicInput

Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub logo

Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub

Cybersecurity

Adaptive behavioural analytics for payment fraud and financial crime

From
On request
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite
PublicInput logo

PublicInput

Government

Inclusive Community Engagement

From
$400/month
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub visa now owns the vendor, so an institution buying scheme-neutral infrastructure, or one competing with Visa value added services, has a governance question that did not exist before December 2024.; PublicInput all three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
  • They diverge on capability: Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub covers Adaptive behavioural analytics, PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub and PublicInput actually diverge.

Attributes where Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub and PublicInput differ
AttributeFeaturespace ARIC Risk HubPublicInput
Starting priceOn request$400/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, LinuxWeb, Ios, Android
CategoryCybersecurityGovernment
FoundedUnknown2014

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub

  • Adaptive behavioural analytics
  • Real time scoring
  • Automated model updates
  • APP scam detection
  • AML transaction monitoring
  • Rules alongside models

Only in PublicInput

  • Virtual Public Meetings
  • Online Surveys
  • Comment Management
  • Multi-language Support
  • Engagement Analytics
  • Zoom
  • Microsoft Teams
  • GovDelivery

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub

  • A UK bank exposed to mandatory reimbursement for authorised push payment scams and needing to intervene before the payment leavesnot PublicInput
  • An acquirer scoring merchant transactions in real time to reduce chargeback exposure without raising decline ratesnot PublicInput
  • A card issuer replacing a rules-only fraud engine whose false positive rate is driving genuine customer declinesnot PublicInput
  • A payments processor that needs one behavioural engine serving both fraud and AML rather than two separate stacksnot PublicInput

PublicInput

  • Civic engagementnot Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
  • Government consultationnot Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
  • Public input collectionnot Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub

  • Visa now owns the vendor, so an institution buying scheme-neutral infrastructure, or one competing with Visa value added services, has a governance question that did not exist before December 2024.
  • Pricing is not published and is volume-linked, which makes the cost of a growth year hard to forecast during a three year business case.
  • Adaptive models are harder to explain to a regulator than deterministic rules, and model risk teams often demand parallel rule coverage that erodes the operational saving.
  • Behavioural profiling needs history, so newly onboarded customers and low frequency accounts are scored with thin data and the detection lift is smallest exactly where fraud concentrates.
  • Deployment into an existing payment path is an engineering project with latency budgets to hit, and banks with legacy core systems often find the integration, not the analytics, is the schedule risk.

PublicInput

  • All three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
  • HTML and CSS customization, custom workflows and approvals, and external system integration with Accela and ESRI are listed as Enterprise Capabilities rather than core platform features
  • Public meetings functionality is sold under a separate Meetings plan rather than being included with the Engagement plans
  • Getting a plan requires booking a consultation and a tailored demo rather than self serve signup

Pricing, plan by plan

Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub

On request
  • ARIC Risk Hub$undefined/year
    • Priced by transaction volume or protected accounts
    • Cloud or on premises deployment
    • Model tuning services quoted separately

PublicInput

$400/month
  • Enterprise$400/month
    • Virtual Meetings
    • Surveys
    • Comment Management

Which should you pick?

Choose Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub if

  • You need adaptive behavioural analytics.
  • You work on Web, Linux.
  • You also want real time scoring.
Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub review

Choose PublicInput if

  • You need virtual public meetings.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want online surveys.
PublicInput review

Questions people ask

Is Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub or PublicInput better?
Neither clearly leads. Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub starts at On request and PublicInput at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub or PublicInput?
Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub starts at On request and PublicInput at $400/month.
Does Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub or PublicInput run on more platforms?
Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub runs on Web, Linux. PublicInput runs on Web, Ios, Android.
What is Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub best used for?
Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub is most often used for a uk bank exposed to mandatory reimbursement for authorised push payment scams and needing to intervene before the payment leaves, an acquirer scoring merchant transactions in real time to reduce chargeback exposure without raising decline rates, a card issuer replacing a rules-only fraud engine whose false positive rate is driving genuine customer declines, a payments processor that needs one behavioural engine serving both fraud and aml rather than two separate stacks. Of those, a uk bank exposed to mandatory reimbursement for authorised push payment scams and needing to intervene before the payment leaves and an acquirer scoring merchant transactions in real time to reduce chargeback exposure without raising decline rates are not what PublicInput is typically brought in for.
What can Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub do that PublicInput cannot?
Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub covers Adaptive behavioural analytics, Real time scoring, Automated model updates, APP scam detection. PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings, Online Surveys, Comment Management, Multi-language Support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub: Is Featurespace still sold as its own product?

Yes. ARIC Risk Hub continues to be sold under the Featurespace name, described as a Visa solution, and is available to non-Visa institutions.

PublicInput: How much does PublicInput cost?

PublicInput does not publish pricing on their website. Customers must request a demo or book a meeting to receive a quote based on their specific needs.

Source
Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub: Does using it require being a Visa customer?

No. The platform is sold to banks, acquirers and processors regardless of scheme relationships, though the ownership is a reasonable governance consideration.

PublicInput: What pricing plans does PublicInput offer?

PublicInput offers Engagement Plans and Meetings Plans, but specific pricing for each plan is not publicly available and requires contacting their sales team.

Source
Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub: Can it run on premises?

Yes. On premises deployment is supported, which matters for institutions with data residency constraints.

Share

Related pages

More on Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub

More on PublicInput

Keep looking

Other head to heads