Cybersecurity · head to head
Proofpoint vs PublicInput

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.; PublicInput all three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- They diverge on capability: Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proofpoint and PublicInput actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proofpoint | PublicInput |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $6/month | $400/month |
| Platforms | Email, Cloud, Web | Web, Ios, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 2002 | 2014 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
Only in PublicInput
- Virtual Public Meetings
- Online Surveys
- Comment Management
- Multi-language Support
- Engagement Analytics
- Zoom
- Microsoft Teams
- GovDelivery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot PublicInput
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot PublicInput
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot PublicInput
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot PublicInput
PublicInput
- Civic engagementnot Proofpoint
- Government consultationnot Proofpoint
- Public input collectionnot Proofpoint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
PublicInput
- All three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- HTML and CSS customization, custom workflows and approvals, and external system integration with Accela and ESRI are listed as Enterprise Capabilities rather than core platform features
- Public meetings functionality is sold under a separate Meetings plan rather than being included with the Engagement plans
- Getting a plan requires booking a consultation and a tailored demo rather than self serve signup
Pricing, plan by plan
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
PublicInput
$400/month- Enterprise$400/month
- Virtual Meetings
- Surveys
- Comment Management
Which should you pick?
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Choose PublicInput if
- You need virtual public meetings.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want online surveys.
Questions people ask
- Is Proofpoint or PublicInput better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proofpoint starts at $6/month and PublicInput at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proofpoint or PublicInput?
- Proofpoint starts at $6/month and PublicInput at $400/month.
- Does Proofpoint or PublicInput run on more platforms?
- Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web. PublicInput runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is Proofpoint best used for?
- Proofpoint is most often used for a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three, an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards, concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policy, retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internally. Of those, a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three and an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards are not what PublicInput is typically brought in for.
- What can Proofpoint do that PublicInput cannot?
- Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull. PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings, Online Surveys, Comment Management, Multi-language Support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
PublicInput: How much does PublicInput cost?
PublicInput does not publish pricing on their website. Customers must request a demo or book a meeting to receive a quote based on their specific needs.
SourceProofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
PublicInput: What pricing plans does PublicInput offer?
PublicInput offers Engagement Plans and Meetings Plans, but specific pricing for each plan is not publicly available and requires contacting their sales team.
SourceProofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
More on PublicInput
Other head to heads
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Polco
- Proofpoint vs Zencity
- Proofpoint vs Accela
- Proofpoint vs CivicPlus
- Proofpoint vs Granicus
- Proofpoint vs DocuWare
- Proofpoint vs Nextdoor for Government
- Proofpoint vs CityView
- Proofpoint vs CentralSquare
- Proofpoint vs RecDesk
- Proofpoint vs CitizenLab
- Proofpoint vs OpenCities
- Proofpoint vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Proofpoint vs Palantir Gotham
- Proofpoint vs Periscope Holdings
- Proofpoint vs Ring Neighbors
- Proofpoint vs Bang the Table
- PublicInput vs Bitdefender Total Security
- PublicInput vs Norton 360
- PublicInput vs 1Password
- PublicInput vs LastPass
- PublicInput vs Trend Micro Vision One
- PublicInput vs Mimecast
- PublicInput vs Qualys VMDR
- PublicInput vs Zscaler Internet Access
- PublicInput vs IBM QRadar
- PublicInput vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- PublicInput vs VMware Carbon Black
- PublicInput vs Sysdig
- PublicInput vs Dahua Technology
- PublicInput vs Descope
- PublicInput vs Drata
- PublicInput vs DTiQ
- PublicInput vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- PublicInput vs ExpressVPN
- PublicInput vs Polco
- PublicInput vs Zencity
- PublicInput vs Accela
- PublicInput vs CivicPlus
- PublicInput vs Granicus
- PublicInput vs DocuWare
- PublicInput vs Nextdoor for Government
- PublicInput vs CityView
- PublicInput vs CentralSquare
- PublicInput vs RecDesk
- PublicInput vs CitizenLab
- PublicInput vs OpenCities
- PublicInput vs Oracle Government Cloud
- PublicInput vs Palantir Gotham
- PublicInput vs Periscope Holdings
- PublicInput vs Ring Neighbors
- PublicInput vs Bang the Table

