Cybersecurity · head to head
NICE Actimize vs Passbolt

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Passbolt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- They diverge on capability: NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NICE Actimize and Passbolt actually diverge.
| Attribute | NICE Actimize | Passbolt |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | web, windows, mac, linux, api |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot Passbolt
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot Passbolt
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot Passbolt
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot NICE Actimize
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot NICE Actimize
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot NICE Actimize
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot NICE Actimize
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is NICE Actimize or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. NICE Actimize starts at On request and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NICE Actimize or Passbolt?
- Passbolt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NICE Actimize and Free for Passbolt.
- Does NICE Actimize or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use Passbolt for free?
- Yes. Passbolt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NICE Actimize starts at On request.
- What is NICE Actimize best used for?
- NICE Actimize is most often used for a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise, a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications, a regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governance, a payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch aml monitoring. Of those, a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise and a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can NICE Actimize do that Passbolt cannot?
- NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection. Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceNICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceNICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRelated pages
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs Bitwarden
- NICE Actimize vs LastPass
- NICE Actimize vs authentik
- NICE Actimize vs 1Password
- NICE Actimize vs Authelia
- NICE Actimize vs Enpass
- NICE Actimize vs HashiCorp Vault
- NICE Actimize vs Infisical
- NICE Actimize vs Norton 360
- NICE Actimize vs Semgrep
- NICE Actimize vs Trivy
- NICE Actimize vs Chainguard
- NICE Actimize vs Trulioo
- NICE Actimize vs Veracode
- NICE Actimize vs Very Good Security
- NICE Actimize vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- NICE Actimize vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs Silent Eight
- Passbolt vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Passbolt vs Quantexa
- Passbolt vs Feedzai
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Fenergo
- Passbolt vs Sardine
- Passbolt vs ThetaRay
- Passbolt vs Transmit Security
- Passbolt vs Socure
- Passbolt vs Sumsub
- Passbolt vs Jumio
- Passbolt vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Passbolt vs Recorded Future
- Passbolt vs RoboForm
- Passbolt vs Semperis
- Passbolt vs SentinelOne
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
