Government · head to head
NEOGOV vs Ping Identity

NEOGOV
Government
Public sector HR suite covering civil service recruiting, onboarding, training and policy management
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NEOGOV each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NEOGOV and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | NEOGOV | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NEOGOV
- Civil service recruiting
- Veterans preference handling
- GovernmentJobs.com posting
- Onboarding workflows
- Learning and training records
- Policy management
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NEOGOV
- A city or county HR department that must run scored examinations and ranked eligibility listsnot Ping Identity
- A public safety agency needing policy acknowledgement records that stand up in litigationnot Ping Identity
- An agency replacing a commercial applicant tracking system that cannot handle veterans preferencenot Ping Identity
- A school district or university consolidating recruiting, onboarding and mandated training recordsnot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot NEOGOV
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot NEOGOV
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot NEOGOV
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot NEOGOV
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NEOGOV
- Each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- Policy management arrived through the PowerDMS acquisition rather than being built in, and the join between it and the rest of the suite still reads as two products.
- Implementation is long and configuration heavy because the civil service rules that make the product valuable have to be encoded for your jurisdiction, and that work is billed.
- Pricing is not published and scales with headcount, so a large agency can pay several times what a comparable one pays without knowing it unless someone reads the public contracts.
- Private equity ownership since the Warburg Pincus investment has coincided with an acquisition led strategy, and buyers should expect further products bolted on rather than deeper integration of the existing ones.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
NEOGOV
On request- NEOGOV Suite$undefined/year
- Quoted per module and scaled by employee headcount
- Implementation and data migration priced separately from the subscription
- Available through cooperative purchasing and state term contracts
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose NEOGOV if
- You need civil service recruiting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want veterans preference handling.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is NEOGOV or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. NEOGOV starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NEOGOV or Ping Identity?
- NEOGOV starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does NEOGOV or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- NEOGOV runs on Web, iOS, Android. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is NEOGOV best used for?
- NEOGOV is most often used for a city or county hr department that must run scored examinations and ranked eligibility lists, a public safety agency needing policy acknowledgement records that stand up in litigation, an agency replacing a commercial applicant tracking system that cannot handle veterans preference, a school district or university consolidating recruiting, onboarding and mandated training records. Of those, a city or county hr department that must run scored examinations and ranked eligibility lists and a public safety agency needing policy acknowledgement records that stand up in litigation are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can NEOGOV do that Ping Identity cannot?
- NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting, Veterans preference handling, GovernmentJobs.com posting, Onboarding workflows. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NEOGOV: Why not use a commercial applicant tracking system?
Because civil service rules such as ranked eligibility lists, rule of three certification and veterans preference are not expressible in commercial products, so the statutory steps end up in spreadsheets.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
NEOGOV: Can I find out what other agencies pay?
Yes. These are public procurements, so executed contract values appear in council agenda packets and state term contract listings. Read several before negotiating.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
NEOGOV: What did NEOGOV acquire?
PowerDMS, a policy management and accreditation product, in 2021, which is now sold as the policy module of the suite.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
NEOGOV: Is it only for the United States?
Effectively yes. The value is in encoding US civil service and public safety requirements.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- NEOGOV vs Tyler Technologies
- NEOGOV vs Granicus
- NEOGOV vs Bonfire
- NEOGOV vs ArchiveSocial
- NEOGOV vs Clariti
- NEOGOV vs GovPilot
- NEOGOV vs Periscope Holdings
- NEOGOV vs Zencity
- NEOGOV vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs mySidewalk
- NEOGOV vs Euna Solutions
- NEOGOV vs VUEWorks
- NEOGOV vs IAPro
- NEOGOV vs iCompass
- NEOGOV vs Mapbox Government
- NEOGOV vs Mark43
- NEOGOV vs MuckRock
- NEOGOV vs GovQA
- NEOGOV vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- NEOGOV vs Frontegg
- NEOGOV vs Speakeasy
- NEOGOV vs Akeyless
- NEOGOV vs authentik
- NEOGOV vs Logto
- NEOGOV vs Authelia
- NEOGOV vs Transmit Security
- NEOGOV vs Delinea
- NEOGOV vs Genetec Security Center
- NEOGOV vs VMware Carbon Black
- NEOGOV vs Rhombus Systems
- NEOGOV vs Yoti
- NEOGOV vs Avast One
- NEOGOV vs Chainguard
- NEOGOV vs Cosign
- NEOGOV vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Tyler Technologies
- Ping Identity vs Granicus
- Ping Identity vs Bonfire
- Ping Identity vs ArchiveSocial
- Ping Identity vs Clariti
- Ping Identity vs GovPilot
- Ping Identity vs Periscope Holdings
- Ping Identity vs Zencity
- Ping Identity vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Ping Identity vs mySidewalk
- Ping Identity vs Euna Solutions
- Ping Identity vs VUEWorks
- Ping Identity vs IAPro
- Ping Identity vs iCompass
- Ping Identity vs Mapbox Government
- Ping Identity vs Mark43
- Ping Identity vs MuckRock
- Ping Identity vs GovQA
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
