Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs NEOGOV

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

NEOGOV
Government
Public sector HR suite covering civil service recruiting, onboarding, training and policy management
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; NEOGOV each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and NEOGOV actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | NEOGOV |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in NEOGOV
- Civil service recruiting
- Veterans preference handling
- GovernmentJobs.com posting
- Onboarding workflows
- Learning and training records
- Policy management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot NEOGOV
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot NEOGOV
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot NEOGOV
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot NEOGOV
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot NEOGOV
NEOGOV
- A city or county HR department that must run scored examinations and ranked eligibility listsnot Chainguard
- A public safety agency needing policy acknowledgement records that stand up in litigationnot Chainguard
- An agency replacing a commercial applicant tracking system that cannot handle veterans preferencenot Chainguard
- A school district or university consolidating recruiting, onboarding and mandated training recordsnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
NEOGOV
- Each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- Policy management arrived through the PowerDMS acquisition rather than being built in, and the join between it and the rest of the suite still reads as two products.
- Implementation is long and configuration heavy because the civil service rules that make the product valuable have to be encoded for your jurisdiction, and that work is billed.
- Pricing is not published and scales with headcount, so a large agency can pay several times what a comparable one pays without knowing it unless someone reads the public contracts.
- Private equity ownership since the Warburg Pincus investment has coincided with an acquisition led strategy, and buyers should expect further products bolted on rather than deeper integration of the existing ones.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
NEOGOV
On request- NEOGOV Suite$undefined/year
- Quoted per module and scaled by employee headcount
- Implementation and data migration priced separately from the subscription
- Available through cooperative purchasing and state term contracts
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose NEOGOV if
- You need civil service recruiting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want veterans preference handling.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or NEOGOV better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and NEOGOV at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or NEOGOV?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and On request for NEOGOV.
- Does Chainguard or NEOGOV run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. NEOGOV runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NEOGOV starts at On request.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what NEOGOV is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that NEOGOV cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting, Veterans preference handling, GovernmentJobs.com posting, Onboarding workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceNEOGOV: Why not use a commercial applicant tracking system?
Because civil service rules such as ranked eligibility lists, rule of three certification and veterans preference are not expressible in commercial products, so the statutory steps end up in spreadsheets.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceNEOGOV: Can I find out what other agencies pay?
Yes. These are public procurements, so executed contract values appear in council agenda packets and state term contract listings. Read several before negotiating.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceNEOGOV: What did NEOGOV acquire?
PowerDMS, a policy management and accreditation product, in 2021, which is now sold as the policy module of the suite.
NEOGOV: Is it only for the United States?
Effectively yes. The value is in encoding US civil service and public safety requirements.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Tyler Technologies
- Chainguard vs Granicus
- Chainguard vs Bonfire
- Chainguard vs ArchiveSocial
- Chainguard vs Clariti
- Chainguard vs GovPilot
- Chainguard vs Periscope Holdings
- Chainguard vs Zencity
- Chainguard vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Chainguard vs mySidewalk
- Chainguard vs Euna Solutions
- Chainguard vs VUEWorks
- Chainguard vs IAPro
- Chainguard vs iCompass
- Chainguard vs Mapbox Government
- Chainguard vs Mark43
- Chainguard vs MuckRock
- Chainguard vs GovQA
- NEOGOV vs Snyk
- NEOGOV vs Trivy
- NEOGOV vs Doppler
- NEOGOV vs Infisical
- NEOGOV vs Grype
- NEOGOV vs Arnica
- NEOGOV vs HashiCorp Vault
- NEOGOV vs Bitwarden
- NEOGOV vs Semgrep
- NEOGOV vs Authelia
- NEOGOV vs Endor Labs
- NEOGOV vs Tenable
- NEOGOV vs Hanwha Vision
- NEOGOV vs Idira
- NEOGOV vs IVPN
- NEOGOV vs Logto
- NEOGOV vs Malwarebytes
- NEOGOV vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- NEOGOV vs Tyler Technologies
- NEOGOV vs Granicus
- NEOGOV vs Bonfire
- NEOGOV vs ArchiveSocial
- NEOGOV vs Clariti
- NEOGOV vs GovPilot
- NEOGOV vs Periscope Holdings
- NEOGOV vs Zencity
- NEOGOV vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs mySidewalk
- NEOGOV vs Euna Solutions
- NEOGOV vs VUEWorks
- NEOGOV vs IAPro
- NEOGOV vs iCompass
- NEOGOV vs Mapbox Government
- NEOGOV vs Mark43
- NEOGOV vs MuckRock
- NEOGOV vs GovQA
