Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs Sourcegraph

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Neo4j is a native graph database; Sourcegraph is an enterprise code intelligence platform.
- Neo4j has a free plan, then $65/mo; Sourcegraph starts at $16000/yr.
- Where Neo4j falls short: AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery.
- Where Sourcegraph falls short: enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Neo4j | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web | Web, Self-hosted |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
Not yet recorded: founded for Sourcegraph.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Neo4j does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Sourcegraph
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Sourcegraph
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Neo4j
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Neo4j
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Neo4j
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Neo4j
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/gb/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/gb/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated CloudOn request
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16,000/yr
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or Sourcegraph?
- Neo4j has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Neo4j and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Neo4j or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web. Sourcegraph runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Yes. Neo4j has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs DataGrip
- Neo4j vs MongoDB
- Neo4j vs RavenDB
- Neo4j vs ScyllaDB
- Neo4j vs Vitess
- Neo4j vs Aiven
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs CosmosDB
- Neo4j vs DataStax
- Neo4j vs dbt
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Cody
- Neo4j vs Sweep
- Neo4j vs Bazel
- Neo4j vs GitHub Copilot
- Neo4j vs Moonrepo
- Neo4j vs Nixpacks
- Neo4j vs Pieces for Developers
- Neo4j vs PyCharm
- Neo4j vs Earthly
- Neo4j vs Harness
- Neo4j vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Neo4j vs Nx Cloud
- Neo4j vs Coder
- Neo4j vs Eclipse
- Neo4j vs Garden
- Neo4j vs GitLab CI/CD
- Neo4j vs HCP Terraform
- Neo4j vs Helm
- Sourcegraph vs Elasticsearch
- Sourcegraph vs ArangoDB
- Sourcegraph vs Dgraph
- Sourcegraph vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Sourcegraph vs DynamoDB
- Sourcegraph vs Couchbase
- Sourcegraph vs Cassandra
- Sourcegraph vs DataGrip
- Sourcegraph vs MongoDB
- Sourcegraph vs RavenDB
- Sourcegraph vs ScyllaDB
- Sourcegraph vs Vitess
- Sourcegraph vs Aiven
- Sourcegraph vs BigQuery
- Sourcegraph vs CosmosDB
- Sourcegraph vs DataStax
- Sourcegraph vs dbt
- Sourcegraph vs CouchDB
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs PyCharm
- Sourcegraph vs Earthly
- Sourcegraph vs Harness
- Sourcegraph vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Sourcegraph vs Nx Cloud
- Sourcegraph vs Coder
- Sourcegraph vs Eclipse
- Sourcegraph vs Garden
- Sourcegraph vs GitLab CI/CD
- Sourcegraph vs HCP Terraform
- Sourcegraph vs Helm

