Software · head to head
Cassandra vs Neo4j

Cassandra
Software
Manage massive amounts of data with linear scalability
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cassandra no support for joins across tables; Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- They diverge on capability: Cassandra covers Linear Scalability, Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cassandra and Neo4j actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cassandra
- Linear Scalability
- Fault Tolerance
- Multi-datacenter Replication
- Tunable Consistency
- CQL Query Language
- Distributed Architecture
- No Single Point of Failure
- DataStax
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Both cover
- Apache Spark
- Linux support
- Windows support
- Mac support
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cassandra
- Real-time applicationsnot Neo4j
- Content managementnot Neo4j
- User profilesnot Neo4j
- Mobile backendsnot Neo4j
- Cachingnot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Running a managed graph database on AWS, Azure or Google Cloudnot Cassandra
- Building knowledge graphs and GraphRAG retrieval for AI applicationsnot Cassandra
- Fraud detection, recommendations and supply chain analysis over connected datanot Cassandra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cassandra
- No support for joins across tables
- No ACID transactions across multiple rows
- Data model must be designed around query patterns upfront, making schema evolution difficult
- Partition key misconfigurations can cause uneven data distribution and hotspots that degrade performance
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
Cassandra
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cassandra review.
Neo4j
Free- CommunityFree
- Single database
- Cypher queries
- APOC library
- AuraDB FreeFree
- 50K nodes
- 175K relationships
- Cloud hosted
- AuraDB Professional$65/month
- Dedicated instance
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cassandra if
- You need linear scalability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want fault tolerance.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Cassandra or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cassandra starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cassandra or Neo4j?
- Cassandra starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does Cassandra or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- Cassandra runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Cassandra for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cassandra best used for?
- Cassandra is most often used for real-time applications, content management, user profiles, mobile backends. Of those, real-time applications and content management are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can Cassandra do that Neo4j cannot?
- Cassandra covers Linear Scalability, Fault Tolerance, Multi-datacenter Replication, Tunable Consistency. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Both handle Apache Spark, Linux support, Windows support, Mac support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cassandra: Does Cassandra support joins between tables?
No. Cassandra does not support joins or foreign keys. The data model requires denormalization, meaning data must be duplicated across tables to support different query patterns.
SourceCassandra: Does Cassandra offer ACID transactions?
No. Cassandra provides only row-level atomicity and isolation, not full ACID transactions across multiple rows or tables. It uses lightweight transactions via Paxos for per-row compare-and-set operations.
SourceCassandra: What programming languages can connect to Cassandra?
Cassandra supports official drivers for multiple languages including Python, Java, Node.js, and Go, allowing applications to communicate via the native Cassandra protocol.
SourceCassandra: Can I deploy Cassandra in the cloud?
Yes. Cassandra can run on any cloud platform (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure) via Docker, virtual machines, or managed services like DataStax Astra DB, which provides a fully managed DBaaS option.
SourceCassandra: Does Cassandra have a free option?
The open source Apache Cassandra is free. DataStax also offers Astra DB with a free tier providing up to 25GB storage and 25 million read/write operations per month.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cassandra vs Cockroach Labs
- Cassandra vs PostgreSQL
- Cassandra vs Airtable
- Cassandra vs Amazon Aurora
- Cassandra vs Elasticsearch
- Cassandra vs PlanetScale
- Cassandra vs Azure SQL
- Cassandra vs ClickHouse
- Cassandra vs Couchbase
- Cassandra vs DuckDB
- Cassandra vs DynamoDB
- Cassandra vs MariaDB
- Cassandra vs Oracle Database
- Cassandra vs Amazon RDS
- Cassandra vs Amazon Redshift
- Cassandra vs Apache Druid
- Cassandra vs CouchDB
- Cassandra vs Firebolt
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs PlanetScale
- Neo4j vs Azure SQL
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs MariaDB
- Neo4j vs Oracle Database
- Neo4j vs Amazon RDS
- Neo4j vs Amazon Redshift
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Firebolt

