Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs Vitess

Vitess
Databases
Scalable database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; Vitess vTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- They diverge on capability: Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and Vitess actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in Vitess
- Horizontal Sharding
- Connection Pooling
- Query Routing
- Online Schema Changes
- Shard Management
- Replication Management
- Automated Failover
- MySQL
Both cover
- Linux support
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Vitess
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Vitess
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Vitess
Vitess
- Transaction processingnot Neo4j
- Data storagenot Neo4j
- Application backendnot Neo4j
- Reportingnot Neo4j
- Data analyticsnot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Vitess
- VTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- Foreign key constraints not enforced across shards, requiring application-level integrity handling
- Single primary per keyspace limits multi-region write capabilities
- Distributed transactions without proper sharding key routing suffer performance degradation
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Vitess
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vitess review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose Vitess if
- You need horizontal sharding.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want connection pooling.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or Vitess better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and Vitess at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or Vitess?
- Neo4j starts at Free and Vitess at Free.
- Does Neo4j or Vitess run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. Vitess runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what Vitess is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that Vitess cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding, Connection Pooling, Query Routing, Online Schema Changes. Both handle Linux support, Docker support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceVitess: Is Vitess free to use?
Yes. Vitess is completely free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license. It is a graduated CNCF project with no licensing costs or pricing tiers.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceVitess: What databases does Vitess support?
Vitess supports MySQL and MariaDB as backend databases. It acts as a middleware layer that adds sharding and orchestration capabilities on top of these databases.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess require Kubernetes to run?
No. Vitess can run on Kubernetes using the Vitess Operator, but it can also be deployed on traditional infrastructure. Kubernetes integration is optional and provides additional automation benefits.
SourceVitess: How does Vitess handle cross-shard transactions?
Vitess supports distributed transactions across shards, but they require queries to be routed through the sharding key. Transactions without a proper sharding key can result in slower performance.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess enforce foreign key constraints?
Vitess does not enforce foreign key constraints across shards by default. Referential integrity must be managed at the application layer, though per-database support can be enabled with limitations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs TiDB
- Neo4j vs Readyset
- Neo4j vs NATS
- Neo4j vs RabbitMQ
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs Azure SQL
- Neo4j vs MariaDB
- Neo4j vs Oracle Database
- Neo4j vs IBM Db2
- Neo4j vs Instaclustr
- Neo4j vs Knack
- Neo4j vs LanceDB
- Neo4j vs Marqo
- Neo4j vs Nile
- Neo4j vs Amazon Redshift
- Vitess vs Elasticsearch
- Vitess vs Cockroach Labs
- Vitess vs PostgreSQL
- Vitess vs Airtable
- Vitess vs Amazon Aurora
- Vitess vs ArangoDB
- Vitess vs Dgraph
- Vitess vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Vitess vs Couchbase
- Vitess vs Cassandra
- Vitess vs Valkey
- Vitess vs Canary Labs
- Vitess vs Chroma
- Vitess vs DynamoDB
- Vitess vs CouchDB
- Vitess vs Apache Doris
- Vitess vs Apache Solr
- Vitess vs TiDB
- Vitess vs Readyset
- Vitess vs NATS
- Vitess vs RabbitMQ
- Vitess vs ClickHouse
- Vitess vs Azure SQL
- Vitess vs MariaDB
- Vitess vs Oracle Database
- Vitess vs IBM Db2
- Vitess vs Instaclustr
- Vitess vs Knack
- Vitess vs LanceDB
- Vitess vs Marqo
- Vitess vs Nile
- Vitess vs Amazon Redshift

