Databases · head to head
ScyllaDB vs Sourcegraph

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- ScyllaDB is a high-performance NoSQL database compatible; Sourcegraph is an enterprise code intelligence platform.
- ScyllaDB is free; Sourcegraph starts at $16000/yr.
- Where ScyllaDB falls short: enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales.
- Where Sourcegraph falls short: enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ScyllaDB and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | ScyllaDB | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Web, Self-hosted |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
Not yet recorded: founded for Sourcegraph.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that ScyllaDB does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Sourcegraph
- Content managementnot Sourcegraph
- User profilesnot Sourcegraph
- Mobile backendsnot Sourcegraph
- Cachingnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot ScyllaDB
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot ScyllaDB
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot ScyllaDB
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot ScyllaDB
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot ScyllaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud StandardOn request
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud ProfessionalOn request
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud PremiumOn request
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB EnterpriseOn request
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16,000/yr
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is ScyllaDB or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. ScyllaDB starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ScyllaDB or Sourcegraph?
- ScyllaDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ScyllaDB and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does ScyllaDB or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Self-hosted, Web. Sourcegraph runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use ScyllaDB for free?
- Yes. ScyllaDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is ScyllaDB best used for?
- ScyllaDB is most often used for real-time applications, content management, user profiles, mobile backends. Of those, real-time applications and content management are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can ScyllaDB do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs MongoDB
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs Dgraph
- ScyllaDB vs Instaclustr
- ScyllaDB vs Elasticsearch
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Cody
- ScyllaDB vs Sweep
- ScyllaDB vs Bazel
- ScyllaDB vs GitHub Copilot
- ScyllaDB vs Moonrepo
- ScyllaDB vs Nixpacks
- ScyllaDB vs Pieces for Developers
- ScyllaDB vs PyCharm
- ScyllaDB vs Earthly
- ScyllaDB vs Harness
- ScyllaDB vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- ScyllaDB vs Nx Cloud
- ScyllaDB vs Coder
- ScyllaDB vs Eclipse
- ScyllaDB vs Garden
- ScyllaDB vs GitLab CI/CD
- ScyllaDB vs HCP Terraform
- ScyllaDB vs Helm
- Sourcegraph vs Cassandra
- Sourcegraph vs MongoDB
- Sourcegraph vs Couchbase
- Sourcegraph vs DataStax
- Sourcegraph vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Sourcegraph vs DynamoDB
- Sourcegraph vs RavenDB
- Sourcegraph vs DataGrip
- Sourcegraph vs Dgraph
- Sourcegraph vs Instaclustr
- Sourcegraph vs Elasticsearch
- Sourcegraph vs turbopuffer
- Sourcegraph vs VerneMQ
- Sourcegraph vs Vespa
- Sourcegraph vs Xata
- Sourcegraph vs YugabyteDB
- Sourcegraph vs Zilliz
- Sourcegraph vs CouchDB
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs PyCharm
- Sourcegraph vs Earthly
- Sourcegraph vs Harness
- Sourcegraph vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Sourcegraph vs Nx Cloud
- Sourcegraph vs Coder
- Sourcegraph vs Eclipse
- Sourcegraph vs Garden
- Sourcegraph vs GitLab CI/CD
- Sourcegraph vs HCP Terraform
- Sourcegraph vs Helm
