Databases · head to head
CosmosDB vs Sourcegraph

CosmosDB
Databases
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Sourcegraph is an enterprise code intelligence platform.
- CosmosDB is free; Sourcegraph starts at $16000/yr.
- Where CosmosDB falls short: autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used.
- Where Sourcegraph falls short: enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmosDB and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | CosmosDB | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Azure | Web, Self-hosted |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
Not yet recorded: founded for Sourcegraph.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that CosmosDB does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot Sourcegraph
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot Sourcegraph
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot CosmosDB
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot CosmosDB
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot CosmosDB
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot CosmosDB
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot CosmosDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16,000/yr
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmosDB or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmosDB starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmosDB or Sourcegraph?
- CosmosDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CosmosDB and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does CosmosDB or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure. Sourcegraph runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use CosmosDB for free?
- Yes. CosmosDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is CosmosDB best used for?
- CosmosDB is most often used for running a globally distributed multi model database on azure, serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions, storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed service. Of those, running a globally distributed multi model database on azure and serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmosDB do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CosmosDB: Is there a free tier for Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, Cosmos DB offers a free tier with 1,000 RU/s of throughput and 25 GB of storage per month for the lifetime of the account, available to new accounts.
SourceCosmosDB: How is Cosmos DB priced after the free tier?
Cosmos DB uses three billing models: provisioned throughput billed per request unit per second, vCore pricing for certain APIs, or serverless consumption pricing where you pay only for requests processed. Reserved capacity offers 20% discount for one year or 30% for three years.
SourceCosmosDB: Can I change my pricing model after choosing one?
No. Once you select a compute pricing model and API, they cannot be changed. This choice is permanent for that database.
SourceCosmosDB: Is there a trial period for Cosmos DB beyond the free tier?
Azure offers a 30-day free trial account for all Azure services. Additionally, Azure AI customers may be eligible for a 90-day free Cosmos DB subscription through the Azure AI Advantage program.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- CosmosDB vs MongoDB
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- CosmosDB vs ArangoDB
- CosmosDB vs DataStax
- CosmosDB vs FaunaDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs RavenDB
- CosmosDB vs RisingWave
- CosmosDB vs ScyllaDB
- CosmosDB vs Solace PubSub+
- CosmosDB vs SQLite
- CosmosDB vs StarRocks
- CosmosDB vs SurrealDB
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs BigQuery
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs Cody
- CosmosDB vs Sweep
- CosmosDB vs Bazel
- CosmosDB vs GitHub Copilot
- CosmosDB vs Moonrepo
- CosmosDB vs Nixpacks
- CosmosDB vs Pieces for Developers
- CosmosDB vs PyCharm
- CosmosDB vs Earthly
- CosmosDB vs Harness
- CosmosDB vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- CosmosDB vs Nx Cloud
- CosmosDB vs Coder
- CosmosDB vs Eclipse
- CosmosDB vs Garden
- CosmosDB vs GitLab CI/CD
- CosmosDB vs HCP Terraform
- CosmosDB vs Helm
- Sourcegraph vs MongoDB
- Sourcegraph vs Cockroach Labs
- Sourcegraph vs Amazon Redshift
- Sourcegraph vs Google Cloud SQL
- Sourcegraph vs ArangoDB
- Sourcegraph vs DataStax
- Sourcegraph vs FaunaDB
- Sourcegraph vs Firebolt
- Sourcegraph vs RavenDB
- Sourcegraph vs RisingWave
- Sourcegraph vs ScyllaDB
- Sourcegraph vs Solace PubSub+
- Sourcegraph vs SQLite
- Sourcegraph vs StarRocks
- Sourcegraph vs SurrealDB
- Sourcegraph vs Amazon Aurora
- Sourcegraph vs BigQuery
- Sourcegraph vs Amazon RDS
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs PyCharm
- Sourcegraph vs Earthly
- Sourcegraph vs Harness
- Sourcegraph vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Sourcegraph vs Nx Cloud
- Sourcegraph vs Coder
- Sourcegraph vs Eclipse
- Sourcegraph vs Garden
- Sourcegraph vs GitLab CI/CD
- Sourcegraph vs HCP Terraform
- Sourcegraph vs Helm
