Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs RavenDB
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; RavenDB the free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- They diverge on capability: Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, RavenDB covers Auto-indexing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and RavenDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
- Spring Data
- Apache Spark
Only in RavenDB
- Auto-indexing
- Graph Queries
- Distributed Counters
- Time Series
- Document Compression
- .NET
- Node.js
- Java
Both cover
- ACID Transactions
- Full-text Search
- Linux support
- Windows support
- Mac support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot RavenDB
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot RavenDB
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot RavenDB
RavenDB
- Running a distributed document database with ACID transactionsnot Neo4j
- Self hosting a multi node database cluster on your own hardwarenot Neo4j
- Replicating operational data out to analytics systems through ETLnot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
RavenDB
- The free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- The free Community licence caps a customer at 60 cores and forces you to stay on the latest major version
- The Professional licence is limited to a single database, a 5 node cluster, 40 cores and 240 GB RAM
- Sharding across nodes, ETL to OLAP, Elasticsearch and Kafka, and data archival are Enterprise only
- Enterprise and AI licence pricing is contact us only with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
RavenDB
Free- CommunityFree
- 3 cores
- 6GB RAM
- Community support
- Professional$499/year
- Production use
- Professional support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose RavenDB if
- You need auto-indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want graph queries.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or RavenDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and RavenDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or RavenDB?
- Neo4j starts at Free and RavenDB at Free.
- Does Neo4j or RavenDB run on more platforms?
- Both run on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what RavenDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that RavenDB cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, High Availability, Graph Data Science. RavenDB covers Auto-indexing, Graph Queries, Distributed Counters, Time Series. Both handle ACID Transactions, Full-text Search, Linux support, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceRavenDB: Is RavenDB free or open source?
RavenDB is open source under the AGPLv3 license and available on GitHub. It also offers a free developer license with enterprise-level features limited to 9 cores, 36GB max RAM, 3 nodes, and non-commercial use.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceRavenDB: Can I use RavenDB commercially for free?
RavenDB offers a free Community License that permits commercial deployment with unlimited databases and sizes, subject to a 60-core maximum per customer and requirement to run the latest major version.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceRavenDB: What commercial licensing options does RavenDB offer?
RavenDB offers Professional, Enterprise, and AI tiers for commercial use. Pricing for these tiers requires contacting their sales team at [email protected].
SourceRavenDB: Does RavenDB offer a cloud hosting option?
RavenDB Cloud provides a fully managed cloud database with maintenance, failover, and backups included. Pricing is available at cloud.ravendb.net/pricing.
SourceRavenDB: Is there a refund window if I purchase RavenDB?
RavenDB offers a 30-day refund window for purchased licenses.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs DataGrip
- Neo4j vs Firestore
- Neo4j vs ScyllaDB
- Neo4j vs Dragonfly
- Neo4j vs Dremio
- Neo4j vs Fivetran HVR
- Neo4j vs Grist
- Neo4j vs IBM Db2
- Neo4j vs Instaclustr
- RavenDB vs Elasticsearch
- RavenDB vs Cockroach Labs
- RavenDB vs PostgreSQL
- RavenDB vs Airtable
- RavenDB vs Amazon Aurora
- RavenDB vs ArangoDB
- RavenDB vs Dgraph
- RavenDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- RavenDB vs Couchbase
- RavenDB vs Cassandra
- RavenDB vs Valkey
- RavenDB vs Canary Labs
- RavenDB vs Chroma
- RavenDB vs DynamoDB
- RavenDB vs CouchDB
- RavenDB vs Apache Doris
- RavenDB vs Apache Solr
- RavenDB vs DataGrip
- RavenDB vs Firestore
- RavenDB vs ScyllaDB
- RavenDB vs Dragonfly
- RavenDB vs Dremio
- RavenDB vs Fivetran HVR
- RavenDB vs Grist
- RavenDB vs IBM Db2
- RavenDB vs Instaclustr


