Softwr

Communication · head to head

Naver Works vs Rocket.Chat

Naver Works logo

Naver Works

Communication

Korean and Japanese business messaging with mail, drive and approval workflows in one licence

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Rocket.Chat logo

Rocket.Chat

Communication

Deployment flexibility and compliance across regulatory frameworks

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Naver Works has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Naver Works the integration ecosystem is small by comparison with Slack or Microsoft Teams, so any workflow that depends on a long tail of third-party apps will need custom development against the Works API.; Rocket.Chat all enterprise plan tiers use custom quote-based pricing
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Naver Works and Rocket.Chat actually diverge.

Attributes where Naver Works and Rocket.Chat differ
AttributeNaver WorksRocket.Chat
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelPer user per monthquote
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, Windows, macOSWeb

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Communication).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Naver Works

  • Messaging with LINE reach
  • Business mail
  • Drive
  • Electronic approval
  • Calendar and board
  • Clova Note
  • Admin and audit

Only in Rocket.Chat

Nothing recorded that Naver Works does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Naver Works

  • A Japanese retailer whose customer service happens over LINE and needs those conversations inside an auditable corporate systemnot Rocket.Chat
  • A Korean company that needs electronic approval workflows in the local style rather than a generic chat tool with a form bolted onnot Rocket.Chat
  • The Seoul or Tokyo office of a multinational that needs a local-language collaboration tool alongside head office Microsoft 365not Rocket.Chat
  • A small team of under 30 people that wants free business messaging with a real upgrade path rather than a message history capnot Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat

  • Deploying HIPAA-compliant messaging for healthcare team communicationnot Naver Works
  • Meeting data sovereignty requirements for government and defense agenciesnot Naver Works
  • Federating secure channels with external partners without shared infrastructurenot Naver Works
  • Maintaining FINRA and MiFID II compliance for financial servicesnot Naver Works
  • Supporting classified network communications in air-gapped environmentsnot Naver Works

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Naver Works

  • The integration ecosystem is small by comparison with Slack or Microsoft Teams, so any workflow that depends on a long tail of third-party apps will need custom development against the Works API.
  • Documentation, support and most community knowledge are in Korean and Japanese; an English-speaking administrator will spend a lot of time in machine translation.
  • Pricing is published in Korean won and the buying experience assumes a Korean or Japanese business entity, which complicates procurement for a company incorporated elsewhere.
  • The Lite tier omits business email, so the plan that looks cheap is messaging only and the realistic entry point for most companies is Standard at more than double the price.
  • Clova Note transcription and several AI features are sold as separate line items rather than bundled, so the quoted per-user figure understates what a team using the full suite actually pays.

Rocket.Chat

  • All enterprise plan tiers use custom quote-based pricing
  • No published pricing for Commercial, Government, or Defense tiers
  • Starter plan link provided but pricing details not included on pricing page

Pricing, plan by plan

Naver Works

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Up to 30 members
    • 5GB shared storage
    • Limited administration and audit features
  • Lite$3000/month
    • Unlimited members
    • 10GB storage per user
    • Messaging, calendar, board and address book
  • Standard$7000/month
    • 100GB storage per user
    • Business email included
    • Fuller administration and audit controls
  • Standard Plus$11000/month
    • 1TB drive per user
    • Larger mail quota
    • Monthly billing is 13,000 KRW

Rocket.Chat

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Rocket.Chat review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Naver Works if

  • You need messaging with line reach.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS.
  • You also want business mail.
Naver Works review

Choose Rocket.Chat if

Nothing in the data separates Rocket.Chat from Naver Works on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Rocket.Chat review

Questions people ask

Is Naver Works or Rocket.Chat better?
Neither clearly leads. Naver Works starts at Free and Rocket.Chat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Naver Works or Rocket.Chat?
Naver Works has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Naver Works and On request for Rocket.Chat.
Does Naver Works or Rocket.Chat run on more platforms?
Naver Works runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS. Rocket.Chat runs on Web.
Can I use Naver Works for free?
Yes. Naver Works has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Rocket.Chat starts at On request.
What is Naver Works best used for?
Naver Works is most often used for a japanese retailer whose customer service happens over line and needs those conversations inside an auditable corporate system, a korean company that needs electronic approval workflows in the local style rather than a generic chat tool with a form bolted on, the seoul or tokyo office of a multinational that needs a local-language collaboration tool alongside head office microsoft 365, a small team of under 30 people that wants free business messaging with a real upgrade path rather than a message history cap. Of those, a japanese retailer whose customer service happens over line and needs those conversations inside an auditable corporate system and a korean company that needs electronic approval workflows in the local style rather than a generic chat tool with a form bolted on are not what Rocket.Chat is typically brought in for.
What can Naver Works do that Rocket.Chat cannot?
Naver Works covers Messaging with LINE reach, Business mail, Drive, Electronic approval.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Naver Works: Can Naver Works really message ordinary LINE users?

Yes. External connection with consumer LINE accounts is the feature that most differentiates it, and it is the main reason it sells in Japan.

Rocket.Chat: How much does Rocket.Chat cost?

Rocket.Chat does not publish pricing. Commercial, Government, and Defense plans require contacting sales for custom quotes. A Starter plan is available for technical evaluation and small businesses but pricing is not shown.

Source
Naver Works: Is Naver Works the same as LINE WORKS?

They are the same lineage under Works Mobile, marketed as Naver Works in Korea and LINE WORKS in Japan and other markets. Feature sets and pricing pages differ by region.

Rocket.Chat: What is the pricing model for Rocket.Chat?

Enterprise plans use a custom quote model. Pricing is determined based on deployment type, regulatory requirements, and specific organizational needs.

Source
Naver Works: Is there a genuinely free tier?

Yes, capped at 30 members with 5GB of shared storage and reduced administration features. It does not expire.

Rocket.Chat: Is there a free plan available?

A Starter plan is mentioned for technical evaluation and small businesses, but no pricing or feature details are published on the pricing page.

Source
Naver Works: Does it work for a company outside Korea and Japan?

Technically yes, but you are buying a regional product. Expect Korean or Japanese support, local billing and few connectors to Western SaaS.

Share

Related pages

More on Naver Works

More on Rocket.Chat

Keep looking

Other head to heads