Maritime · head to head
NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Windward

NAPA Fleet Intelligence
Maritime
Vessel performance, emissions compliance and voyage optimisation built on NAPA hydrodynamic ship models
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NAPA Fleet Intelligence model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.; Windward requires embedded expert analysts for actionable intelligence; cannot operate fully autonomously
- They diverge on capability: NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model, Windward covers AI-powered risk scoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NAPA Fleet Intelligence and Windward actually diverge.
| Attribute | NAPA Fleet Intelligence | Windward |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3000/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1996 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- NAPA Performance Model
- AIS-based analysis
- Voyage optimisation
- Emissions reporting
- Hull and propeller performance
- Fleet benchmarking
- Onboard integration
- Passenger ship modules
Only in Windward
- AI-powered risk scoring
- Sanctions compliance
- Ship-to-ship detection
- Dark activity alerts
- Compliance systems
- Trading platforms
- Banking systems
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- A charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using AIS data alonenot Windward
- An owner needing auditable CII and EU ETS numbers rather than spreadsheet estimatesnot Windward
- A technical manager deciding whether hull cleaning this quarter pays for itself in fuelnot Windward
- A fleet arguing a charter party speed and consumption claim and needing model-backed evidencenot Windward
Windward
- Detecting vessel spoofing using multi-sensor AIS, dark vessel signals, and satellite datanot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Conducting UN sanctions investigations for North Korea maritime compliancenot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Performing financial AML and sanctions screening for maritime transactionsnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Identifying drug smuggling routes in international shipping networksnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Tracking port delays and causes in real-time shipping visibilitynot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.
- Pricing is per vessel and unpublished, and modular scoping means the quote you compare against a competitor may not cover the same functions.
- Building the vessel-specific performance model requires hull form and design data that owners of older or second-hand tonnage often do not have, which turns onboarding into a data hunt.
- It is a monitoring and advisory layer, not a system of record; you still run a separate planned maintenance system, a chartering system and a crewing system.
- NAPA is strongest in the design and stability world, and its operational reference base, while real, is smaller than the pure voyage-optimisation specialists, so integration breadth with commercial shipping software is narrower.
Windward
- Requires embedded expert analysts for actionable intelligence; cannot operate fully autonomously
- Platform focuses on specific maritime regions (Strait of Hormuz, Somali piracy zones); may not provide equally robust global coverage
- Classified as unclassified and shareable, limiting penetration into highly classified defense operations
- API-dependent architecture (GraphQL-based) may create integration complexity for some organizations
- Multi-source data integration can be resource-intensive for organizations lacking dedicated intelligence staff
Pricing, plan by plan
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
On request- NAPA Fleet Intelligence$undefined/year
- Licensed per vessel with modular scope
- Fleet agreements and multi-year terms negotiated
- Vessel model creation may be a one-off setup charge
Windward
$3000/month- Professional$7500/month
- Behavioral analytics
- Dark activity detection
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose NAPA Fleet Intelligence if
- You need napa performance model.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want ais-based analysis.
Choose Windward if
- You need ai-powered risk scoring.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want sanctions compliance.
Questions people ask
- Is NAPA Fleet Intelligence or Windward better?
- Neither clearly leads. NAPA Fleet Intelligence starts at On request and Windward at $3000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NAPA Fleet Intelligence or Windward?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence starts at On request and Windward at $3000/month.
- Does NAPA Fleet Intelligence or Windward run on more platforms?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence runs on Web, Cloud. Windward runs on Web, Api.
- What is NAPA Fleet Intelligence best used for?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence is most often used for a charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using ais data alone, an owner needing auditable cii and eu ets numbers rather than spreadsheet estimates, a technical manager deciding whether hull cleaning this quarter pays for itself in fuel, a fleet arguing a charter party speed and consumption claim and needing model-backed evidence. Of those, a charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using ais data alone and an owner needing auditable cii and eu ets numbers rather than spreadsheet estimates are not what Windward is typically brought in for.
- What can NAPA Fleet Intelligence do that Windward cannot?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model, AIS-based analysis, Voyage optimisation, Emissions reporting. Windward covers AI-powered risk scoring, Sanctions compliance, Ship-to-ship detection, Dark activity alerts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Do we need onboard sensors?
No. NAPA can produce performance analysis from AIS and noon reports using its hydrodynamic model, though instrumented data improves accuracy.
Windward: Does Windward provide autonomous intelligence or does it require human analysts?
Windward requires expert analysts to embed directly in your mission to deliver intelligence-ready products. The platform supports analyst workflows but cannot operate fully autonomously.
SourceNAPA Fleet Intelligence: Does it handle EU ETS and CII?
Yes, emissions calculation and regulatory reporting for EU MRV, IMO DCS, CII and EU ETS are covered.
Windward: What data sources does Windward use beyond AIS?
Windward integrates multiple data sources including AIS, dark vessel signals, Earth Observation (EO), Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and RF signals to provide multi-sensor maritime intelligence where AIS alone is insufficient.
SourceNAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is it the same NAPA used for ship design?
Yes, same company, and Fleet Intelligence reuses the hydrodynamic modelling from that business.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is pricing published?
No. It is licensed per vessel by module, quoted per fleet.
Related pages
More on NAPA Fleet Intelligence
Other head to heads
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs DNV Navigator Port
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Veson Nautical
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kpler
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Bearing AI
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ZeroNorth
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Helm Operations
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Danaos
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs SpeedyDock
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs FleetMon
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Nautilus Labs
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kaleris
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Linerlytica
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs MDS Transmodal
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ORBCOMM
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Pole Star Global
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ChartCo
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Voyager Worldwide
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs MarineTraffic
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kongsberg Maritime
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Sea Machines
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Vortexa
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs DNV Maritime
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs NAVTOR
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Q88
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs S&P Global Maritime
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Spire Global Maritime
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Xeneta
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Alphaliner
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Baltic Exchange
- Windward vs DNV Navigator Port
- Windward vs Veson Nautical
- Windward vs Kpler
- Windward vs Bearing AI
- Windward vs ZeroNorth
- Windward vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- Windward vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- Windward vs Helm Operations
- Windward vs Danaos
- Windward vs SpeedyDock
- Windward vs FleetMon
- Windward vs Nautilus Labs
- Windward vs Kaleris
- Windward vs Linerlytica
- Windward vs MDS Transmodal
- Windward vs ORBCOMM
- Windward vs Pole Star Global
- Windward vs ChartCo
- Windward vs Voyager Worldwide
- Windward vs MarineTraffic
- Windward vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Windward vs Sea Machines
- Windward vs Vortexa
- Windward vs DNV Maritime
- Windward vs NAVTOR
- Windward vs Q88
- Windward vs S&P Global Maritime
- Windward vs Spire Global Maritime
- Windward vs Xeneta
- Windward vs Alphaliner
- Windward vs Baltic Exchange

