Maritime · head to head
Q88 vs Windward
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Q88 the Internet Archive's capture of Q88 LLC's corporate homepage on 19 February 2016 stated Q88.com had 75% of the world-wide tanker industry onboard and served over 1,000 clients across four named products (Q88.com, Q88Dry.com, Milbros.com, Q88VMS.com), with no price figure published for any; this is a 2016 capture and figures are dated.; Windward requires embedded expert analysts for actionable intelligence; cannot operate fully autonomously
- They diverge on capability: Q88 covers Vessel questionnaires, Windward covers AI-powered risk scoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Q88 and Windward actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Q88
- Vessel questionnaires
- Vetting support
- Documentation management
- Compliance tracking
- Oil major systems
- Chartering platforms
- Fleet management
Only in Windward
- AI-powered risk scoring
- Sanctions compliance
- Ship-to-ship detection
- Dark activity alerts
- Compliance systems
- Trading platforms
- Banking systems
Both cover
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Q88
No use cases recorded yet. See the Q88 review.
Windward
- Detecting vessel spoofing using multi-sensor AIS, dark vessel signals, and satellite datanot Q88
- Conducting UN sanctions investigations for North Korea maritime compliancenot Q88
- Performing financial AML and sanctions screening for maritime transactionsnot Q88
- Identifying drug smuggling routes in international shipping networksnot Q88
- Tracking port delays and causes in real-time shipping visibilitynot Q88
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Q88
- The Internet Archive's capture of Q88 LLC's corporate homepage on 19 February 2016 stated Q88.com had 75% of the world-wide tanker industry onboard and served over 1,000 clients across four named products (Q88.com, Q88Dry.com, Milbros.com, Q88VMS.com), with no price figure published for any; this is a 2016 capture and figures are dated.
Windward
- Requires embedded expert analysts for actionable intelligence; cannot operate fully autonomously
- Platform focuses on specific maritime regions (Strait of Hormuz, Somali piracy zones); may not provide equally robust global coverage
- Classified as unclassified and shareable, limiting penetration into highly classified defense operations
- API-dependent architecture (GraphQL-based) may create integration complexity for some organizations
- Multi-source data integration can be resource-intensive for organizations lacking dedicated intelligence staff
Pricing, plan by plan
Q88
$200/month- Vessel Manager$500/month
- Q88 questionnaires
- Vessel profiles
- Documentation
Windward
$3000/month- Professional$7500/month
- Behavioral analytics
- Dark activity detection
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Q88 if
- You need vessel questionnaires.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want vetting support.
Choose Windward if
- You need ai-powered risk scoring.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want sanctions compliance.
Questions people ask
- Is Q88 or Windward better?
- Neither clearly leads. Q88 starts at $200/month and Windward at $3000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Q88 or Windward?
- Q88 starts at $200/month and Windward at $3000/month.
- Does Q88 or Windward run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What can Q88 do that Windward cannot?
- Q88 covers Vessel questionnaires, Vetting support, Documentation management, Compliance tracking. Windward covers AI-powered risk scoring, Sanctions compliance, Ship-to-ship detection, Dark activity alerts. Both handle Web support, Api support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Windward: Does Windward provide autonomous intelligence or does it require human analysts?
Windward requires expert analysts to embed directly in your mission to deliver intelligence-ready products. The platform supports analyst workflows but cannot operate fully autonomously.
SourceWindward: What data sources does Windward use beyond AIS?
Windward integrates multiple data sources including AIS, dark vessel signals, Earth Observation (EO), Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and RF signals to provide multi-sensor maritime intelligence where AIS alone is insufficient.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Q88 vs ChartCo
- Q88 vs MarineTraffic
- Q88 vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Q88 vs Sea Machines
- Q88 vs DNV Maritime
- Q88 vs NAVTOR
- Q88 vs Pole Star Global
- Q88 vs Voyager Worldwide
- Q88 vs Kpler
- Q88 vs Freightos
- Q88 vs Helm Operations
- Q88 vs Navis N4
- Q88 vs ShipNet
- Q88 vs SpeedyDock
- Q88 vs CargoSmart
- Q88 vs Danaos
- Q88 vs DNV Navigator Port
- Q88 vs Vortexa
- Q88 vs S&P Global Maritime
- Q88 vs Spire Global Maritime
- Q88 vs Xeneta
- Q88 vs Alphaliner
- Q88 vs Baltic Exchange
- Q88 vs Bearing AI
- Windward vs ChartCo
- Windward vs MarineTraffic
- Windward vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Windward vs Sea Machines
- Windward vs DNV Maritime
- Windward vs NAVTOR
- Windward vs Pole Star Global
- Windward vs Voyager Worldwide
- Windward vs Kpler
- Windward vs Freightos
- Windward vs Helm Operations
- Windward vs Navis N4
- Windward vs ShipNet
- Windward vs SpeedyDock
- Windward vs CargoSmart
- Windward vs Danaos
- Windward vs DNV Navigator Port
- Windward vs Vortexa
- Windward vs S&P Global Maritime
- Windward vs Spire Global Maritime
- Windward vs Xeneta
- Windward vs Alphaliner
- Windward vs Baltic Exchange
- Windward vs Bearing AI


