Maritime · head to head
Kaleris vs Windward

Kaleris
Maritime
Terminal operating, yard, rail and vessel software assembled from acquired supply chain brands
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kaleris the portfolio was assembled by acquisition, so the single platform description is commercial rather than technical, and connecting two Kaleris products often requires professional services and a custom interface.; Windward requires embedded expert analysts for actionable intelligence; cannot operate fully autonomously
- They diverge on capability: Kaleris covers Terminal operating system, Windward covers AI-powered risk scoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kaleris and Windward actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kaleris
- Terminal operating system
- Yard management
- Transportation management
- Carrier and vessel solutions
- Rail visibility
- Maintenance and repair operations
- Execution and visibility platform
- Equipment control integration
Only in Windward
- AI-powered risk scoring
- Sanctions compliance
- Ship-to-ship detection
- Dark activity alerts
- Compliance systems
- Trading platforms
- Banking systems
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kaleris
- A container terminal replacing a legacy or in-house terminal operating system before an automation programmenot Windward
- A port authority standardising several terminals on one operating system and reporting layernot Windward
- An ocean carrier that needs stowage planning and vessel performance tooling alongside terminal systemsnot Windward
- A rail or intermodal operator trying to reduce demurrage exposure with asset level visibilitynot Windward
Windward
- Detecting vessel spoofing using multi-sensor AIS, dark vessel signals, and satellite datanot Kaleris
- Conducting UN sanctions investigations for North Korea maritime compliancenot Kaleris
- Performing financial AML and sanctions screening for maritime transactionsnot Kaleris
- Identifying drug smuggling routes in international shipping networksnot Kaleris
- Tracking port delays and causes in real-time shipping visibilitynot Kaleris
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kaleris
- The portfolio was assembled by acquisition, so the single platform description is commercial rather than technical, and connecting two Kaleris products often requires professional services and a custom interface.
- A terminal operating system implementation runs 12 to 24 months with parallel operation, and the software licence is a minor line next to integration, equipment interfaces and retraining crane and gate staff.
- Private equity ownership means the roadmap is shaped by acquisition strategy and an eventual exit, and a terminal signing a decade-long dependency has no visibility of who the next owner will be.
- Configuration expertise is concentrated in the vendor and a small consultancy pool, so terminals end up buying vendor services for changes an internal team should be able to make.
- The strength is container handling, and bulk, breakbulk and ro-ro terminals get a thinner functional fit that has to be closed with configuration and workarounds.
Windward
- Requires embedded expert analysts for actionable intelligence; cannot operate fully autonomously
- Platform focuses on specific maritime regions (Strait of Hormuz, Somali piracy zones); may not provide equally robust global coverage
- Classified as unclassified and shareable, limiting penetration into highly classified defense operations
- API-dependent architecture (GraphQL-based) may create integration complexity for some organizations
- Multi-source data integration can be resource-intensive for organizations lacking dedicated intelligence staff
Pricing, plan by plan
Kaleris
On request- Kaleris platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per site, by throughput and modules taken
- Implementation and integration services are the larger share of first-year cost
- Equipment and gate interfaces scoped and priced individually
Windward
$3000/month- Professional$7500/month
- Behavioral analytics
- Dark activity detection
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Kaleris if
- You need terminal operating system.
- You work on Web, On-premise, Private cloud.
- You also want yard management.
Choose Windward if
- You need ai-powered risk scoring.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want sanctions compliance.
Questions people ask
- Is Kaleris or Windward better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kaleris starts at On request and Windward at $3000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kaleris or Windward?
- Kaleris starts at On request and Windward at $3000/month.
- Does Kaleris or Windward run on more platforms?
- Kaleris runs on Web, On-premise, Private cloud. Windward runs on Web, Api.
- What is Kaleris best used for?
- Kaleris is most often used for a container terminal replacing a legacy or in-house terminal operating system before an automation programme, a port authority standardising several terminals on one operating system and reporting layer, an ocean carrier that needs stowage planning and vessel performance tooling alongside terminal systems, a rail or intermodal operator trying to reduce demurrage exposure with asset level visibility. Of those, a container terminal replacing a legacy or in-house terminal operating system before an automation programme and a port authority standardising several terminals on one operating system and reporting layer are not what Windward is typically brought in for.
- What can Kaleris do that Windward cannot?
- Kaleris covers Terminal operating system, Yard management, Transportation management, Carrier and vessel solutions. Windward covers AI-powered risk scoring, Sanctions compliance, Ship-to-ship detection, Dark activity alerts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kaleris: Is Kaleris the same thing as Navis?
No. Navis is the terminal operating system product line, now owned by Kaleris after Cargotec sold it to Accel-KKR in 2021. Kaleris is the parent group and sells several other product lines alongside it.
Windward: Does Windward provide autonomous intelligence or does it require human analysts?
Windward requires expert analysts to embed directly in your mission to deliver intelligence-ready products. The platform supports analyst workflows but cannot operate fully autonomously.
SourceKaleris: Who owns Kaleris?
It is backed by the private equity firm Accel-KKR and assembled from acquired software businesses.
Windward: What data sources does Windward use beyond AIS?
Windward integrates multiple data sources including AIS, dark vessel signals, Earth Observation (EO), Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and RF signals to provide multi-sensor maritime intelligence where AIS alone is insufficient.
SourceKaleris: How long does a terminal operating system deployment take?
Plan for 12 to 24 months at a working container terminal, including parallel running. Anything shorter usually means a limited scope or a small facility.
Kaleris: Does it suit bulk or breakbulk terminals?
Less well. The functional depth is in container handling, and other cargo types require significant configuration.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kaleris vs CargoSmart
- Kaleris vs Navis N4
- Kaleris vs Veson Nautical
- Kaleris vs Harbour Assist
- Kaleris vs Flexport
- Kaleris vs SpeedyDock
- Kaleris vs Dockwa
- Kaleris vs Helm Operations
- Kaleris vs NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Kaleris vs Bearing AI
- Kaleris vs ZeroNorth
- Kaleris vs DNV Maritime
- Kaleris vs MarinaOffice
- Kaleris vs Molo
- Kaleris vs NAVTOR
- Kaleris vs Orca AI
- Kaleris vs NAPA
- Kaleris vs Pole Star Global
- Kaleris vs ChartCo
- Kaleris vs Voyager Worldwide
- Kaleris vs MarineTraffic
- Kaleris vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Kaleris vs Sea Machines
- Kaleris vs Vortexa
- Kaleris vs Q88
- Kaleris vs Kpler
- Kaleris vs S&P Global Maritime
- Kaleris vs Spire Global Maritime
- Kaleris vs Xeneta
- Kaleris vs Alphaliner
- Kaleris vs Baltic Exchange
- Kaleris vs DNV Navigator Port
- Windward vs CargoSmart
- Windward vs Navis N4
- Windward vs Veson Nautical
- Windward vs Harbour Assist
- Windward vs Flexport
- Windward vs SpeedyDock
- Windward vs Dockwa
- Windward vs Helm Operations
- Windward vs NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Windward vs Bearing AI
- Windward vs ZeroNorth
- Windward vs DNV Maritime
- Windward vs MarinaOffice
- Windward vs Molo
- Windward vs NAVTOR
- Windward vs Orca AI
- Windward vs NAPA
- Windward vs Pole Star Global
- Windward vs ChartCo
- Windward vs Voyager Worldwide
- Windward vs MarineTraffic
- Windward vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Windward vs Sea Machines
- Windward vs Vortexa
- Windward vs Q88
- Windward vs Kpler
- Windward vs S&P Global Maritime
- Windward vs Spire Global Maritime
- Windward vs Xeneta
- Windward vs Alphaliner
- Windward vs Baltic Exchange
- Windward vs DNV Navigator Port

